Progress in Voting? Progress in Education?

The NY Times article “Supreme Court invalidates key part of Voting Rights Act” details what happened when the Supreme Court struck down Provision 4 of the landmark 1965 Voting Rights Act, and, on the whole, the comments responding to it are among the most intelligent on any issue I’ve read about recently.

SEE  http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/26/us/supreme-court-ruling.html?pagewanted=1&_r=0&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20130626.

2013 Supreme Court decision on Voting Rights ActoIn sum, the Supreme Court decision handed down on June 25, 2013, revoked the government’s ability to pre-approve—or not—restrictions any state might place on voting, especially those states, mainly in the South, which had a historic record of voter discrimmination, directed mainly at blacks.  The case  revolved around basically the same question I was just exploring with my graduate students exactly one week before as we read Lisa Delpit’s classic, controversial book Other People’s Children in my course Race, Ethnicity, and the American Experience.  There Delpit indicted the very nature of American education and the education of American teachers for being so thoroughly white they largely misunderstood the needs of minority children and all teachers, minority or white, who would teach them.   Do the same conditions exist now for voting as those that existed in 1965?  Do the same conditions exist now that existed for education issues in 1995, the year Delpit published Other People’s Children?

Other People's Children by Lisa DelpitDelpit’s case presents a much clearer picture.  Study after study shows relatively little progress in the problem areas she identified: educational philosophy and teacher training tuned specifically to white middle and upper class students = a systemic  disadvantage to minority students.  Well-meaning, but ultimately deaf “progressives”—ones who based their philosophies on “academic” research and trendiness without listening to minority voices—were, she said, perhaps more at fault than anybody.

Precious little has changed in the near-quarter century since Delpit wrote the first of her ground-breaking pieces.  This NY Times article on the black-white education gap (see http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/20/education/20gap.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 )  identifies roughly 700 schools making good progress, but this is out of roughly 100,000 total schools (130,000 if you include privates, which may not have been part of the research).  Ross Wiener, a principal partner at the Education Trust, a group that works to close achievement gaps, found the results of the studies reported on “profoundly disturbing.”  They showed, he said, that schools continued to be a “significant source of disadvantage for minority students.”

On the other hand, as Justice Roberts pointed out, in some Southern districts black voters now outnumber white, and two of the most notorious cities now have black mayors.  However, attempts to obstruct minority voters were flagrant in many districts during the 2012 election, especially in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida; and Texas is now moving swiftly to instate voter ID laws and to redraw districts in ways that will probably make it harder for blacks and latinos to vote effectively.  There’s much to indicate that we see racism less today only because it’s been driven more underground.  It’s still huge, but it’s not “politically correct” to be overtly racist.  The Court’s decision could drive more racism above ground, as the swift Texas response indicates.

One person commented that it was hard not to think the conservative justices were looking for ways to bolster Republican chances, as the Republican base—older white men—decreases, while young whites turn increasingly independent and blacks and latinos remain solidly Democrate.  Personally, I don’t think the justices are this blatantly “political,” a view which causes my progressive friends to laugh loudly in my face.  I believe they’re “ideological,” though I suppose this often—though not always—amounts to the same thing.

As for education, things still seem to move at a glacial pace.  There’s still so much systemic inequality in education, much of it the same as Delpit pointed out nearly 20 years ago.  And things adjacent to education aren’t fairing much better—the state of children’s books, for example.  A recent NPR report called the world of children’s books “stubbornly white” even as demographics undergo a seismic shift (see http://www.opb.org/artsandlife/article/npr-as-demographics-shift-kids-books-stay-stubbornly-white/ ).  If it all starts with education, as most of us believe, it will be a long time before social and political equality become more entrenched, if ever.  Or perhaps it starts first with politics?  If so, this June’s Supreme Court decision vis-a-vis the Voting Rights Act doesn’t bode well for much faster progress either.

Go to the Teaching Diversity page.
Go to the Reviews & Commentary page.

This entry was posted in Reviews & Commentary, Social Change and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>