Chris Rock on Saturday Night Live. David Letterman’s Top 10 lists. Go Hawks! (for Chicagoans, at least).
After the Hawks’ triple-overtime victory over the Bruins in the first game of the 2013 Stanley Cup Finals, I couldn’t help but think of Chris Rock’s Nat X—his dashiki-wearing, super-high-Afro-sporting, black brother mock tv host of the “only 15-minute show on television.” A classic SNL segment. “Why 15 minutes?” Nat X whines at the beginning of one episode, “Because if the Man gave me any more, he’d consider it welfare!” A feature of each installment was his Top 5 List. “Why 5? ‘Cause 10 would make the Man nervous!”
Here’s Nat X’s “Top 5 Reasons Brothers don’t play hockey”:
- Reason #5: It’s cold out there.
- Reason #4: They scared to get their gold tooth knocked out.
- Reason #3: Don’t want to be around white guys with sticks.
- Reason #2: Don’t want to be around a white guy with a mask.
- …and the #1 Reason Black Guys Don’t Play Hockey: Don’t feel the need to dominate yet another sport.
I haven’t been able to locate a video of the actual bit—none of the links I found work—but there is a transcript of the whole thing HERE. And there are a couple of complete shows on YouTube: One featuring a Top 5 list spoofing Whoopi Goldberg, and with “guests” featuring “Jesse Jackson,” and Tracy Morgan doing Mike Tyson, another featuring “Latoya Jackson” and the real Spike Lee.
On the night of the hockey and black guys Top 5, Nat X’s mock guests were Colin Powell (played by Tim Meadows) and Vanilla Ice (Kevin Bacon).
Vanilla Ice: I’m from the streets, man! If it weren’t for rap, I’d probably be in jail, or dead. Word to your mother!
Nat X: [ fuming ] So you’re saying you’re from the streets?
Vanilla Ice: Word to your mother!
Nat X: What street? “Sesame Street”?
Is Colin Powell (or Barack Obama) an authentic black man? Is Vanilla Ice an authentic rapper? “What’s authentic”? It’s one of culture’s most important questions, and it’s fiercely double-edged: grounding our identity, supposedly, but also trapping it for sure. Nat X, says the announcer in the Hulu clip above, “Is so black they counted him four times in the million man march.” But is “4” the magic number? Why not 5, or 6.5, or 1? Nat X made the best fun of the authenticity game, something not often so fun in the real world, and something harder to determine in a world that’s mixing more and more.
But we were talking about hockey. The Blackhawks. Like Johnny Oduya, the part-Kenyan Swedish hockey player. Like the Afro-Canadian Ray Emery. Surely not as authentic as Nat X, but….
♦ Go to a commentary on Chris Rock’s musing that “Racism is almost over,” and to one on Louis C.K.’s idea that when it comes to blacks and whites “Now we’re even.”
♦ Go to the Teaching Diversity main page.








Progress in Voting? Progress in Education?
The NY Times article “Supreme Court invalidates key part of Voting Rights Act” details what happened when the Supreme Court struck down Provision 4 of the landmark 1965 Voting Rights Act, and, on the whole, the comments responding to it are among the most intelligent on any issue I’ve read about recently. (Read the article and comments HERE.)
Precious little has changed in the near-quarter century since Delpit wrote the first of her ground-breaking pieces. A NY Times article on the black-white education gap—read it HERE—identifies roughly 700 schools making good progress, but this is out of roughly 100,000 total schools (130,000 if you include privates, which may not have been part of the research). Ross Wiener, a principal partner at the Education Trust, a group that works to close achievement gaps, found the results of the studies reported on “profoundly disturbing.” They showed, he said, that schools continued to be a “significant source of disadvantage for minority students.”
On the other hand, as Justice Roberts pointed out, in some Southern districts black voters now outnumber white, and two of the most notorious cities now have black mayors. However, attempts to obstruct minority voters were flagrant in many districts during the 2012 election, especially in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida; and Texas is now moving swiftly to instate voter ID laws and to redraw districts in ways that will probably make it harder for blacks and latinos to vote effectively. There’s much to indicate that we see racism less today only because it’s been driven more underground. It’s still huge, but it’s not “politically correct” to be overtly racist. The Court’s decision could drive more racism above ground, as the swift Texas response indicates.
One person commented that it was hard not to think the conservative justices were looking for ways to bolster Republican chances, as the Republican base—older white men—decreases, while young whites turn increasingly independent and blacks and latinos remain solidly Democrate. Personally, I don’t think the justices are this blatantly “political,” a view which causes my progressive friends to laugh loudly in my face. I believe they’re “ideological,” though I suppose this often—though not always—amounts to the same thing.
As for education, things still seem to move at a glacial pace. There’s still so much systemic inequality in education, much of it the same as Delpit pointed out nearly 20 years ago. And things adjacent to education aren’t fairing much better: the state of children’s books, for example. A recent NPR report—see it HERE—called the world of children’s books “stubbornly white” even as demographics undergo a seismic shift. If it all starts with education, as most of us believe, it will be a long time before social and political equality become more entrenched, if ever. Or perhaps it starts first with politics? If so, this June’s Supreme Court decision vis-a-vis the Voting Rights Act doesn’t bode well for much faster progress either.
√ Go to the Teaching Diversity page.
√ Go to the Reviews & Commentary page.