Progress in Voting? Progress in Education?

The NY Times article “Supreme Court invalidates key part of Voting Rights Act” details what happened when the Supreme Court struck down Provision 4 of the landmark 1965 Voting Rights Act, and, on the whole, the comments responding to it are among the most intelligent on any issue I’ve read about recently. (Read the article and comments HERE.)

2013 Supreme Court decision on Voting Rights ActoIn sum, the Supreme Court decision handed down on June 25, 2013, revoked the government’s ability to pre-approve—or not—restrictions any state might place on voting, especially those states, mainly in the South, which had a historic record of voter discrimmination, directed mainly at blacks.  The case  revolved around basically the same question I was just exploring with my graduate students exactly one week before as we read Lisa Delpit’s classic, controversial book Other People’s Children in my course Race, Ethnicity, and the American Experience.  There Delpit indicted the very nature of American education and the education of American teachers for being so thoroughly white they largely misunderstood the needs of minority children and all teachers, minority or white, who would teach them.   Do the same conditions exist now for voting as those that existed in 1965?  Do the same conditions exist now that existed for education issues in 1995, the year Delpit published Other People’s Children?

Other People's Children by Lisa DelpitDelpit’s case presents a much clearer picture.  Study after study shows relatively little progress in the problem areas she identified: educational philosophy and teacher training tuned specifically to white middle and upper class students = a systemic  disadvantage to minority students.  Well-meaning, but ultimately deaf “progressives”—ones who based their philosophies on “academic” research and trendiness without listening to minority voices—were, she said, perhaps more at fault than anybody.

Precious little has changed in the near-quarter century since Delpit wrote the first of her ground-breaking pieces.  A NY Times article on the black-white education gap—read it HERE—identifies roughly 700 schools making good progress, but this is out of roughly 100,000 total schools (130,000 if you include privates, which may not have been part of the research).  Ross Wiener, a principal partner at the Education Trust, a group that works to close achievement gaps, found the results of the studies reported on “profoundly disturbing.”  They showed, he said, that schools continued to be a “significant source of disadvantage for minority students.”

On the other hand, as Justice Roberts pointed out, in some Southern districts black voters now outnumber white, and two of the most notorious cities now have black mayors.  However, attempts to obstruct minority voters were flagrant in many districts during the 2012 election, especially in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida; and Texas is now moving swiftly to instate voter ID laws and to redraw districts in ways that will probably make it harder for blacks and latinos to vote effectively.  There’s much to indicate that we see racism less today only because it’s been driven more underground.  It’s still huge, but it’s not “politically correct” to be overtly racist.  The Court’s decision could drive more racism above ground, as the swift Texas response indicates.

One person commented that it was hard not to think the conservative justices were looking for ways to bolster Republican chances, as the Republican base—older white men—decreases, while young whites turn increasingly independent and blacks and latinos remain solidly Democrate.  Personally, I don’t think the justices are this blatantly “political,” a view which causes my progressive friends to laugh loudly in my face.  I believe they’re “ideological,” though I suppose this often—though not always—amounts to the same thing.

As for education, things still seem to move at a glacial pace.  There’s still so much systemic inequality in education, much of it the same as Delpit pointed out nearly 20 years ago.  And things adjacent to education aren’t fairing much better: the state of children’s books, for example.  A recent NPR report—see it HERE—called the world of children’s books “stubbornly white” even as demographics undergo a seismic shift.  If it all starts with education, as most of us believe, it will be a long time before social and political equality become more entrenched, if ever.  Or perhaps it starts first with politics?  If so, this June’s Supreme Court decision vis-a-vis the Voting Rights Act doesn’t bode well for much faster progress either.

Go to the Teaching Diversity page.
Go to the Reviews & Commentary page.

Posted in Reviews & Commentary, Social Change | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Nat X: Top 5 Reasons Brothers Don’t Play Hockey

10/17/2006 10:16 PMChris Rock on Saturday Night Live.  David Letterman’s Top 10 lists.  Go Hawks! (for Chicagoans, at least).

After the Hawks’ triple-overtime victory over the Bruins in the first game of the 2013 Stanley Cup Finals, I couldn’t help but think of Chris Rock’s Nat X—his dashiki-wearing, super-high-Afro-sporting, black brother mock tv host of the “only 15-minute show on television.”  A classic SNL segment.  “Why 15 minutes?” Nat X whines at the beginning of one episode, “Because if the Man gave me any more, he’d consider it welfare!”  A feature of each installment was his Top 5 List.  “Why 5? ‘Cause 10 would make the Man nervous!”

Here’s Nat X’s “Top 5 Reasons Brothers don’t play hockey”:

  • Reason #5: It’s cold out there.
  • Reason #4: They scared to get their gold tooth knocked out.
  • Reason #3: Don’t want to be around white guys with sticks.
  • Reason #2: Don’t want to be around a white guy with a mask.
  • …and the #1 Reason Black Guys Don’t Play Hockey: Don’t feel the need to dominate yet another sport.

I haven’t been able to locate a video of the actual bit—none of the links I found work—but there is a transcript of the whole thing HERE.  And there are a couple of complete shows on YouTube: One featuring a Top 5 list spoofing Whoopi Goldberg, and with “guests” featuring “Jesse Jackson,” and Tracy Morgan doing Mike Tyson, another featuring “Latoya Jackson” and the real Spike Lee.

On the night of the hockey and black guys Top 5, Nat X’s mock guests were Colin Powell (played by Tim Meadows) and Vanilla Ice (Kevin Bacon).

Vanilla Ice: I’m from the streets, man! If it weren’t for rap, I’d probably be in jail, or dead. Word to your mother!

Nat X:  [ fuming ] So you’re saying you’re from the streets?

Vanilla Ice: Word to your mother!

Nat X: What street? “Sesame Street”?

Is Colin Powell (or Barack Obama) an authentic black man?  Is Vanilla Ice an authentic rapper?  “What’s authentic”?  It’s one of culture’s most important questions, and it’s fiercely double-edged: grounding our identity, supposedly, but also trapping it for sure.  Nat X, says the announcer in the Hulu clip above, “Is so black they counted him four times in the million man march.”  But is “4” the magic number?  Why not 5, or 6.5, or 1?  Nat X made the best fun of the authenticity game, something not often so fun in the real world, and something harder to determine in a world that’s mixing more and more.

But we were talking about hockey.  The Blackhawks.  Like Johnny Oduya, the part-Kenyan Swedish hockey player.  Like the Afro-Canadian Ray Emery.  Surely not as authentic as Nat X, but….

Go to a commentary on Chris Rock’s musing that “Racism is almost over,” and to one on Louis C.K.’s idea that when it comes to blacks and whites “Now we’re even.”

 Go to the Teaching Diversity main page.

 

Posted in Diversity & Multiculturalism, Reviews & Commentary | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Frank Marshall Davis: Lyricism and Protest

FM DavisFor most of his life Frank Marshall Davis (1905-1987) worked as a journalist for papers such as the Gary American, the Atlanta World, and the Chicago Star, a labor weekly he co-founded and served as executive editor.  Moving to Hawaii, he worked for the Honolulu Record and made the acquaintance of the young Barack Obama, an acquaintance that has led to lots of internet tripe and right-wing paranoia. He also wrote fiction and published a classic essay in the “My Most Humiliating Jim Crow Experience” series in Negro Digest in 1944.

Because of his anti-racist stands and his association with labor and the Communist Party, the FBI maintained a file on him from the mid-40’s to mid-60’s, and he was pressured by the House on Un-American Activities committee.

Through all this Davis also managed to produce a significant body of poetry.  “Rarely in African American literary history,” writes John Edgar Tidwell, “has one poet been made to serve the interests of two movements…”—meaning that Davis’ career held major significance for the so-called “Negro Renaissance” in the late-20’s and early 30’s, as well as the Black Arts Movement of the 60’s.  In addition to many uncollected poems, his poetry books include Black Man’s Verse (1935), I Am the American Negro (1937), 47th Street (1948), Jazz Interludes (1976), and Awakening and Other Poems (1978).  Black Man’s Verse begins with the classic lines: “Chicago is an overgrown woman / wearing her skyscrapers / like a necklace….”

In his foreword to 47th Street he writes:

“I am a Negro writer.

“A Negro is an individual who has been shunted aside for discriminatory treatment as an inferior because an ancestor is know to have been a dark African native.  That is the only possible definition of Negro on the basis of science and actuality. You see, Negroes do not belong to a distinct race because there is no such thing as a Negro or black race, just as there is no Caucasian or white race, and no Mongolian or yellow race.  The so-called black race has blue eyed blonds who are lighter than the swarthy brunettes classed as members of the alleged white race.  To call a blue eyed blonde a member of the black race is a monstrous absurdity to be expected only of the United States which boasts it has bigger and better everything, which automatically includes absurdities….

“American will have Negro writers until the whole concept of race is erased.”

Davis’ poetry is notable not only for its social engagement, especially in the fight against racism,  but also for its fluent, lyrical language and stunning imagery, and, though he produced many short lyrics, for its dedication to long-form poetry, often arranged as mini-dramas.  A monumental poem about a major Chicago Southside park, “Washington Park,” for example, begins famously with, “The heat roars / Like a tidal wave / Over Chicago’s Congo…,” and includes sketches of the Park’s inhabitants, from a homeless man to a Communist organizer.”

His series “Ebony Under Granite,” gave imagined, poetic post-mortems on a variety of Black people—including himself! “Frank Marshall Davis: Writer,” one of his poems I included in my book Black Writing from Chicago, begins:

“He is bitter
A bitter bitter cynic”
They said
“And his wine
He brews from wormwood.”

Yet even here, and in other lines of this poem of bitter protest, his beautiful lyricism peeps through: “From the ebony house of me I watched days swing into weeks,” “I turned to what was called my race…and I looked at a white man’s drama acted by inky performers,” “For when I wrote / I dipped my pen / In the crazy heart / Of mad America.”

This unique fusing of lyricism and protest is perhaps his greatest literary achievement. In some ways, he couldn’t help but “write pretty,” for he seemed to find beauty, sometimes even quiet reflectiveness, in the most glaring clashes. His poem “Four Glimpses of Night,” definitely in the style of the “Negro Renaissance,” showed this tendency very early:

Night’s brittle song, sliver-thin,
Shatters into a billion fragments
Of quiet shadows
At the blaring jazz
Of a morning sun.

Go to a list of Black Writers written about on this site, OR the Teaching Diversity main page.

Posted in Black Writers, Chicago Writing, Diversity & Multiculturalism | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment