Take My People With Me: Juneteenth 2023

This post is part of a series on Juneteenth. Go to the series LEAD POST.

The video below shows a few minutes of Aurora, Illinois’ 2023 Juneteenth celebration at MLK Jr. Park.  It’s one of the oldest in the state (at 33 years Rockford’s owns the crown). “It’s been going 22 years,” said Congressman Bill Foster during his annual drop-in. “My smile muscles are almost broken.” “So are mine,” said our luminous emcee, whose name I again didn’t catch but am on a mission to find before next year’s celebration.  The last shot of the video is of him from behind, so you can read his t-shirt: “I’m steal healing b.u.”

Well, he literally was, as he wore a big brace on his left leg, a brace that didn’t stop him dancing all around during his energetic hosting.  The emphasis on healing, though, is symbolic of a larger emphasis growing in importance to the Black community.  One speaker you’ll see urged the crowd to become aware of themselves as a people again. “We’ve lost that,” he said, and in an inventive metaphor asked, “If the bear feeds the bear, does the bear hate the lion?” He was urging Blacks not only to love each other but spend with each other, support each other economically.  That’s what whites do, why not us?

His short talk blended perfectly with the next person on stage, a young lady who did a dramatic dance to Cynthia Erivo’s “Stand Up,” the theme song for Kasi Lemmons’ movie Harriet.  “Look at this,” said our emcee.  “She could have said I’m gonna do some Cardi B.  Instead she’s lifting up Harriet Tubman!”

A few acts later, up come three kids doing the latest dance, until the emcee asks, “Any body else can do this? Come up here!” Suddenly the stage is exploding with dancers.  I said to my daughter-in-law, Desiree, “Doesn’t it make your knees hurt just watching them?”  So this emphasis on supporting each other economically and celebrating the great figures of freedom like Harriet Tubman was, as usual, wrapped in fun, and food, and the market atmosphere of dozens of merchant’s tents, plus the cars and motorcycles that showed up for the parade that would end off the evening.

I’m writing this just as the big parades celebrating pride month are coming to an end, and I’ve been thinking a lot about the lessons the LGBTQ+ community can teach us about keeping the issue of race before the American public.  Though that community is suffering lots of backlash currently, and over 600 bills have been proposed in legislatures nation-wide to curb that community, the LGBTQ+ movement has seemed to turn a corner.  The general American public seems supportive—enthusiastically so in many cases—and ready to advocate for them.  In my church’s JEDI group (Justice-Equity-Diversity-Inclusion), there’s been so much progress on LGBTQ+ issues.  It’s much harder in matters of race.  For all the troubles LGBTQ+ people have suffered, and continue to suffer, it’s just easier for that movement.  There are many reasons for this, I believe. Here are just four: 1) people can inherently relate to sexuality more than race; 2) the bulk of that community—at least the out-front parts—are white; 3) Pride celebrations are just more fun, making the issue of inclusion easier to get behind; and 4) there’s more of a tradition of therapy in that population.  Only in the last 25 years or so has there been a growing, widespread acknowledgment of the mental health crisis—the trauma—caused by racism.*  And racism is woven so deeply into the fabric of American life that it’s hard to get to, and the tasks to change systems are often of gigantic proportions.

But at this year’s Juneteenth celebration in Aurora, I thought that maybe this holiday might be one of the things that helps more and more Americans embrace the fight against racism as much as the celebrations of Pride Month have helped that community.  I’m deep in thought about that, and maybe my hope might someday grow deeper as well.

* See my articles on Joy DeGruy and Resmaa Menakem for more on the rise of therapies to treat the trauma of racism.
Go to the lead post for the anti-racism workshop Becoming the Beloved Community and to the Diversity Training and Teaching main page.

Posted in Music & Media Podcasts, Social Change | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

A Response to One of Those Lists

We love lists, and they’re thick on my newsfeed every day.  Here’s a tiny sampling of lists I saw in just a couple of hours today: “8 ’90s Hit Songs That Are Offensive by Today’s Standards,” “3 ‘overlooked’ red flags that your job is setting you up for burnout,” “10 Things to Never Do After Having a Meal,” “21 Things That Were Cool in the 90s But No One Cares About Anymore,” “16 Laughable Scams That Thrive on the Stupidity of Their Victims.” Lots of these lists have to do with music, like the first one listed above, and they rank things, like all 229 Taylor Swift songs, worst to best, or the 10 best drum solos, or the top 5 reasons the Beatles broke up.  And on May 31, 2023, one appeared titled “12 Cover Songs That Render the Original Renditions Entirely Obsolete,” and for some reason I felt I needed to reply to one item.  Does Whitney Houston’s 1992 version of Dolly Parton’s “I Will Always Love You”—written by Parton and first released in 1974—render Dolly’s version “obsolete.”  I don’t think so.

So many of us love Whitney, and rightfully so, though a Rolling Stone list ranking her the second greatest singer of all time is surely a giant over-reach.  Jaimee Marshall, writing for the finance and pop culture website Wealth of Geeks, says that Whitney’s “rendition of ‘I Will Always Love You’ has become an iconic masterpiece. Houston’s powerful vocals, emotional depth, and stunning range elevated the song to new heights, capturing the hearts of millions worldwide. Her rendition effortlessly surpasses the original, infusing it with an unmatched intensity and raw emotion.”  But I’ve always preferred Dolly Parton’s version.

More and more, it seems, we love power, we love people belting out a tune, some even loving that Frozen song “Let It Go” blaring at us over and over.  To me it comes close to bellowing, which sometimes I feel Whitney Houston’s “I Will Always Love You” just barely manages to escape.  I often—though not always—feel it’s just too much.  Someone, at the time Houston’s cover came out, said the emotion in it seemed unearned because it lacked true regret. There’s something to be said for restraint, especially when the song expresses something complex, something you’re not going to want to blare out, like leaving someone you’ll always love.  Dolly Parton’s lilting country voice conveys that complex regret beautifully, and the way she speaks the song’s central part while staying in rhythm, prevents the sentiments there from becoming saccharine.  If I ever did a Top 25 Vocal Performances list, Parton’s version would be on it.  Besides, on another list I saw today, “The 99 Most Popular Musicians of All Time,” Dolly Parton came in at #1, my favorite, Ray Charles, at #5, while Whitney Houston was only at #34.

Instead of making a list, I’ll probably just harken back to the pinnacle of list-making, David Letterman’s “Top 10 List.”  I have three volumes of Top Ten Lists in my library. On the back of the first volume there’s the “Top 10 Reasons to Buy This Book” list.  #5: You’re mentioned on page 43. #4: Paper made from criminal trees that deserved to die,” etc.  Or go to Chris Rock’s parody, which I write about on this site: “Nat X: Top Five Reasons Brothers Don’t Play Hockey.”

Go to the Reviews and Commentaries page.

Posted in Music & Meaning, Reviews & Commentary | Leave a comment

Jazz. The Future?

The Video/Audio below is an excerpt from the 16th, and final, show of my radio series Voices and Freedoms: A History of Jazz, based on my 1976 book of the same name.  The 16-part series played across the nation for five years in the late 70’s/early 80’ and holds its relevance—or is even more so—today than it was back then. The excerpts present about 6 to 10 minutes of the original 30-minute broadcasts, though this show— being the final, sum-it-up show—I let go a bit longer. The link above takes you to information about the book and our plans to re-release it and provide access to the full-length original shows. Go HERE for a complete list of shows and links to all excerpts.

 

Last shows in a series are always difficult. How do you sum it up?  How do you get a crystal ball with enough power to say anything really meaningful about the future? Most of the people I asked about the future of jazz said they didn’t know, so I followed their lead.

I thanked a lot of people, especially those jazz greats I was lucky enough to have on my show in the first place. Four of them join me here: three of the great players in jazz history, each of whom was also an important composer—reed man Wayne Shorter, trumpeter Freddy Hubbard, and keyboardist Joe Zawinul. Also joining me was one of the great jazz historians and critics, Martin Williams, at that time head of the Smithsonian’s jazz program.

Williams expresses some concern about jazz rock, and, being the late 70’s, I express some concern about the influence disco was having on jazz at the time.  Freddie Hubbard expresses concern about jazz getting so far out that it was losing its audience.  There were other worries, too, but still hope in the music’s future, with me expressing my expectation that jazz would continue to be a major force in keeping human voices and human freedoms alive.  We mention people we like, especially pianist Keith Jarrett, but I end by playing a number I didn’t know the name of, played by players I didn’t know either. It was the Fresno State Jazz Ensemble playing at the 1975 UC Berkeley Jazz Festival.  This was the future of jazz, and the number showed the players knew both how to play and the history of what they were playing, too.

Some twenty years after both the Voices and Freedoms book and radio series came out, I was teaching a course on jazz in a study abroad program in London.  At that time I was enthused—and continue to be enthused—about the combination of world music and jazz, and also of hip hop and jazz. I also loved jazz players soloing over all kinds of turntables and electronica.  I took my students to performances of this kind, but the class was unusually devoted to classic jazz and jazz standards.  One evening, I met them at Club 707, one of London’s famous jazz clubs. Reportedly, Paul McCartney and Elvis Costello frequented the place, so there was some excitement about possibly getting to rub shoulders with these rock greats. When I got there, however, the excitement was more about something else. “Thanks, Dr. G,” they seemed to say in rousing unison as I entered the room. I had written the club saying my jazz students were coming, and the club had assumed they were jazz musicians and were giving them all drinks on the house.

The band that evening combined Algerian Rai music with jazz.  They were good, but then unexpected launched into a Miles Davis standard—I think it was “So What?” from his classic Kind of Blue album—and suddenly got very, very good.  Everything seemed to click.  They got in the pocket, as we say, and the students seemed to turn to me as one, saying clearly though wordlessly, “See, the old ways, the classic stuff, is always the best.”

Wayne Shorter

I suppose the traditions in all kinds of so-called classic jazz are deep enough and challenging enough to keep jazz going forever.  There will always be players who will take your breath away because of their virtuosity and their inventiveness that brings constant newness to the standards.  Still, one wonders if there will ever be the searching experimentation of Bop or New Thing jazz again.  Perhaps the cutting edge of music has passed beyond jazz for good.  In the emphasis on spontaneous creativity, however, on virtuosity, and on finding newness in even the most standard of standards, I don’t think jazz will ever be eclipsed as an art.  Beyond this it still stands as uniquely dedicated to keeping the human voice and human freedoms alive.

♦ Go to the Diversity Training and Teaching main page, and to a complete list of these show excerpts.

Posted in Diversity & Multiculturalism, Music & Meaning, Music & Media Podcasts | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment