The Paradox of “Leadership Lists”

Lists2So many books on leadership and management feature lists.  There’s Edwards Deming’s “14 Management Principles,” Steven Covey’s “7 Habits of Highly Effective People,” Robert Quinn’s “8 Seed Thoughts.”

Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals contains 11 rules on “the ethics of means and ends” and 13 rules on tactics.  Even Robert Greenleaf’s essay The Servant as Leader, at least the way I read it, contains eight qualities or actions of servant leadership.  (Go to the Lead Post in my series on this important essay to see my list of what I think his list is!)

What does this communicate about the process of becoming a leader? Many leadership books read like stereotypical self-help books, and, more important, one is tempted to read them as if they were cook books.  Do this, this, and this, and out will pop the leader in you. Yet so many of these books also talk about more mysterious processes, processes that may have yielded lists but actually start with deep intuitions and feelings for what is right. Robert Quinn’s book Change the World: How Ordinary People Can Accomplish Extraordinary Results throws irony on top of paradox by starting each chapter with Lists3quotes from Jesus, Gandhi, and Martin Luther King, Jr.  “Ordinary People”?  But as he pushes his take on deep change—his Advanced Change Theory (ACT), with its “8 Seed Thoughts”—he says, in a section titled “The Inaccessibility of ACT”: “Understanding of the transformational process does not emanate from logical analysis…it does not come from external authority of the theological institution.  It emanates from principled living and higher levels of moral reason…”—this last reference stemming from another list, Kohlberg’s ubiquitous “Six Stages of Moral Reasoning.”

At one point even crusty, hard-nosed Saul Alinsky, defining the qualities of a great organizer, turns to Adam Smith’s The Money Game, where Smith describes a great fund manager:  “It is personal intuition, sensing patterns of behavior.  There is always something unknown, undiscerned…You can’t just graduate an analyst into managing funds.  What is it the good managers have?  It’s a kind of locked-in concentration, an intuition, a feel, nothing that can be schooled.  The first thing you have to know is yourself.”  In “Art, Rhythm, Intuition, and Social Change” I wrote of how important “sensing patterns” was to a list of qualities and actions Robert Greenleaf’s servant leader had to have.  And as to how he came up with the idea of servant leadership itself (and started a whole field of leadership thinking), Robert Greenleaf says, “I didn’t get the notion of the servant as leader from conscious logic. Rather it came to me as an intuitive insight. And I do not see what is relevant from my own searching and experience in terms of a logical progression from premise to conclusion.”

Lists1It’s a constant, nagging question.  How much can anything, let alone leadership, be taught? For years I’ve told my writing students that their ability to write will come 40% from just writing themselves, 40% from reading, and only 20% from what I teach them—and that last could be a generous estimate.  From just writing and reading will come a feeling for the resonances of words, the rhythms of sentences, the pace of an entire composition. And these percentages don’t take into account what may be the most important thing of all: what, as Quinn might say, “emanates from principled living.”  Here “principled living” could be taken more broadly as meaning the intensity with which writers live and feel the “human condition.”  This last phrase—also mysterious—perhaps finally boils down to how much empathy writers have for others…and for themselves.

How do you develop that?  There’s certainly lots of books, each containing lists pointing to more lists in a nearly infinite regression, all supposed to guide us there.  But maybe only 20% there.  And that’s IF we understand that those lists are finally just approximations, more or less honest, that could help lead us to more difficult, mysterious, powerful places in our selves.

This article is part of a series on John Greenleaf’s The Servant as Leader.  Go to the series’ Lead Post.

Go to the main page for Leadership for Social Change.

Posted in Social Change | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Art, Rhythm, Intuition, and Social Change

In his pamphlet The Servant as Leader, Robert Greenleaf writes: “The prudent man is he who constantly thinks of  ‘now’ as the moving concept in which past, present moment, and future are one organic unity.  And this requires living by a sort of rhythm that encourages a high level of intuitive insight about the whole gamut of events from the indefinite past, through the present moment, to the indefinite future.  One is at once, in every moment of time, historian, contemporary analyst, and prophet—not three separate roles.  This is what the practicing leader is, every day of his life.”

Greenleaf-Rhythm1As it is in passage after passage in this seminal essay—the essay which started the field of Servant Leadership studies—there’s much to unpack  and ponder.  Here I want to concentrate on the phrase, “And this requires living by a sort of rhythm that encourages a high level of intuitive insight….”  Though it may be different for each person, each person must ask, “What kind of rhythm would that be, and do I live my life by it?”

Recently, I spoke at a small conference at my college.  The topic was “Grief and Social Change,” and this question of what rhythm we live our life to was one of the three main questions I asked.  It was about 2:15 p.m., and I said, “Let me describe my day to you so far.  I woke at 3:30 a.m. to go from my home in Aurora to prepare and serve a meal from 6:00 to 7:00 a.m. at the Daybreak Shelter in Joliet.  I got home around 8:00 a.m. to pick up my wife and drive her to work in Oak Park.  Getting home around 10:00 a.m., I took about a two hour nap, waking at noon, cleaning up, driving to a sale to pick up things for our new house, before rushing here—often going 80 plus miles an hour down Highway 88—to speak to you for about an hour, after which I’ll return to my office to send back a thesis draft to a graduate student before heading to my God daughter’s 12th birthday around 4:30, then leaving there about 6:00 to attend a function at my wife’s work back in Oak Park.  Now, what kind of rhythm would you say that is?  Is it one that in any way encourages a high level of intuitive insight?”

Greenleaf-Rhythm2It was a ridiculous question, of course.  And my point wasn’t that I was busier than anyone else.  It was a packed schedule, to be sure, but not all that far off from the pace many of us live our lives by much of the time.  It’s a rhythm that encourages a high degree of being frantic, not being intuitive.  In short, we’re just too busy running around to be good leaders.

So what, besides slowing down—way down—must we do?  For a long while now, the general prescription for our times has been to create quiet times, to meditate, to pray—if you’re religious—focusing, perhaps, on some portion of scripture.  What else?  Throughout The Servant as Leader Greenleaf emphasizes artists and the role of art.  “Besides being quieter and meditating,” I asked, “how much time do we spend with art?  Listening to music, for example, not just having it in the background, but attending to it, being with it?”  Or being with a painting, a sculpture, a tapestry, photograph?  Or with nature, which many believe is the greatest art of all?

Greenleaf-Rhythm3What might we gain from being with art?  Many things, of course.  Here, I’ll focus on just this: we gain an intuitive sense for patterns and the  rhythm of patterns.  A particular piece of art presents patterns as a unified, organic, rhythmic whole. This rhythmic wholeness is common to all art. Paintings display it as much as music does, and architecture has been described as “frozen music.”  In this way artistic rhythm parallels, develops, and nourishes that organic sense of the relationship between past, present, and future Greenleaf speaks about.  It nourishes and develops a special feeling for rhythms and patterns of wholeness, which produce foresight, because past patterns you remember, and patterns you’re experiencing now, can help you feel what may be coming next.  Greenleaf calls foresight the servant leader’s “central ethic.”  An intuitive sense of pattern and rhythm helps the servant leader “know the unknowable,” say what we must be doing, and set a direction for us.  It allows the servant leader to conceptualize these things—that is, what will happen if we go in this direction, act in this way—and conceptualization, says Greenleaf, is the leader’s central talent.  Spending time with art is one of the prime ways to develop a sense of rhythm—a sense of pattern and wholeness—that encourages the highest quality intuitions.

This article is part of a series on Robert Greenleaf’s The Servant as Leader.  Go to the series’ Lead Post.

Posted in Social Change | Leave a comment

The “Structure” of “The Servant as Leader”

Note:  This is the lead post in a series on Robert Greenleaf’s The Servant as Leader.  A seminal piece in leadership theory, this small book—a long essay, actually—started the whole field of Servant Leadership studies.  See end for a list of articles in this series. Also, go to the main page for my course Leadership for Social Change.
____________________

Greenleaf-CenterWhen I speak of the “structure” of Robert Greenleaf’s The Servant as Leader, I’m speaking of the structure I see in it, the structure I use when I’m leading a discussion of it. Structure, not to mention logical structure, didn’t seem so important to Greenleaf.  “I didn’t get the notion of the servant as leader from conscious logic,” he says early in his essay.  “Rather it came to me as an intuitive insight.  And I do not see what is relevant from my own searching and experience in terms of a logical progression from premise to conclusion.”  Furthermore, he admits that there “may be real contradiction in the servant as leader,” and that his own “perceptual world is full of contradictions.”  The essay, therefore, proceeds in short, reflective, questioning sections, usually just two to five paragraphs long, none fully or formally developed. As a kind of outline for discussion, however, I see the essay falling very roughly into three parts.

PART ONE  focuses on the Individual.  “Who is the Servant-Leader?” asks one of the main section headings.  Greenleaf expresses extraordinary faith in the power of the individual, so much so that as he speaks of the importance of listening for prophetic voices in the world, he says, “It is seekers…who make the prophet.”   “The faith [my italics] that sustains the choice to be a servant leader, Greenleaf says, is “psychological self-insight.”

Greenleaf-ServantLeadBookPART TWO  explores eight Qualities or Actions that both define and develop the servant leader.  These are:  1) Withdrawing, 2) Accepting, 3) Knowing (the unknowable), 4) Foreseeing (what he calls the servant leader’s “central ethic”), 5) Perceiving, 6) Persuading, 7) Acting, and 8) Conceptualizing (the servant leader’s prime talent).

PART THREE  focuses on Community, which he calls “The lost knowledge of these times.”  It is here he speaks of those who take up social change as doing so to “heal themselves” from some grief, some wound, some pain.  “There is something subtle communicated to one who is being served and led if, implicit in the compact between servant-leader and led, is the understanding that the search for wholeness is something they share.”  That sharing creates community.  Writing in 1970, he says, “The signs of the times suggest that…the next 30 years will be marked as the period when the dark skinned and the deprived and the alienated of the world effectively asserted their claims to stature…” and “were not led by a privileged elite…It may be that the best that some of today’s privileged can do is to stand aside and serve by helping when asked and as instructed.”  Nearly 50 years later, we begin to see the prescience of this comment.

This series seeks to reflect on some of the most important insights of this seminal essay, beginning below with the connection between grief and social change.  This article, in part, also introduces a video of a news report on one of my graduate student’s projects in the Leadership for Social Change course.

 

Articles in the “The Servant as Leader” series:
Grief and Social Change
Homelessness and Me
 Art, Rhythm, Intuition and Social Change
Servants Know First: A Sermon
Inside Dance
Three Central Servant Leadership Questions
The Paradox of “Leadership Lists”
Prophecy, Rhetoric, and Servant Leadership
Servant Leadership in the “Real World”?
♦ Every Person’s God-Given Ability to Contribute.”  In this and other posts I mention Greenleaf’s idea of the importance of who leads, mentioned above.

Posted in Social Change | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment