Louis C.K. on Race: So I guess we’re even?

Louis C.K.Comedian Louis C.K. has joked about race and privilege for years.  Here on a 2010 Tonight Show appearance, he does a great reprise of his basic white privilege bit—especially starting at about the 8:30 mark in this 12-minute segment, even though Jay Leno tries to steer him off the subject with some inane questions.

Some time later UpWorthy.com uploaded this bit again, giving it the title “Sometimes It Takes a White Dude to Get Real About Racism.”  But there’s absolutely nothing more “real” about C.K.’s take on racism and white privilege than the mountains of “real” expressions on racism and privilege that have come from people of color for centuries.  It’s just that our expressions don’t carry as much weight.  That’s one measure of how systemic racism is, how a cultural system turns some voices lower and some higher.  I like the way C.K. speaks about racism, and I’m thankful, but people of color do wish we could speak for ourselves sometimes and be heard around half as much.  People of color also wish we could be heard without that “Oh-they’re-whining-again” dismissive smirk that C.K. never has to suffer.  (C.K. is half Mexican, I understand, though his looks conceal this completely, a situation which has given him unusual access to racist behavior.)  In the moment, you can just laugh.  But for laughter and pain and analysis rolled into one, try Richard Pryor some time.  Maybe you don’t laugh quite as hard—maybe—but he leaves you with the ache of pain caused by racism, and that lasts a long time after the aches of laughter leave.  It’s really real.

For me the highlight of the Tonight Show reprise comes at the very end.  “White people suffered, too.  We suffered when we lost our slaves.  So I guess now we’re even.”

Our cultural system allows us to put crazy equal and un-equal signs everywhere.  Here’s an example I use all the time: In my state, Illinois, less than 1% of white students go to chronically failing schools, while nearly 40% of black students do.  (Go HERE to read more.)  This 40 to 1 advantage makes it far, far less likely that a black student will get into college, but many white students will point to that one case of preferential treatment—I don’t deny things like this exist—as if it things were now even…or worse:  as if that one case were actually something to get as enraged about as the tens of thousands of cases where a student of color never even gets a chance.  Afterall, it’s America—Oh Beautiful for Level Playing Fields—where everyone’s equal, everyone has the same chance.

Here’s another short YouTube video focused on another aspect of C.K.’s privilege bit.  This one focuses on time travel.  He says as a white person he could go back anywhere in time and feel comfortable, but he fears for the future.  (Sensitive watchers should beware of a very crude image at this point.)  I don’t know, C.K.  Sometimes progress seems so slow—notwithstanding our first black President—that I think you’ll be able to feel comfortable for decades into the future.

The educational disparity mentioned above would be a great addition to Louis C.K.’s privilege bit, as would a long list of other absolutely stunning disparities in health, wealth, opportunities, and virtually every other aspect in life.  Louis, if you’re listening, please speak for us!  Seems like we can’t be real without you.

 Go to the TEACHING DIVERSITY main page.

Posted in Diversity & Multiculturalism, Social Change | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Leadership and Diversity

Upon the completion of a Diversity Plan for Naperville Community Unit School District 203 (see the plan brochure HERE), I, as committee chair, made these comments to the Board of Education on February 23, 1998.

 

THOUGHTS ON LEADERSHIP AND DIVERSITY
by Richard R. Guzman

Naperville United School District 203 Diversity PlanI had hoped that the things I want to say here could have been part of our diversity plan.  But there was not enough time to integrate them carefully into the substance of the plan, and forcing the issue would have taken us beyond agreed committee processes.  Then I realized that I was really wanting to speak about things that went beyond the plan any way, so I asked the committee if I could simply add my thoughts as an addendum and speak as an individual.  I want to thank the committee for their forbearance.  Unofficial as these thoughts are, however, I do want them as part of the record, and so will provide the Board and anyone else who wants them, with copies of what I want to add to our thinking about our diversity plan—which is this:

The diversity plan presented here seeks not only to change processes and structures, it seeks to change a culture, and beyond that to help people change on the inside.  But no plan, however finely articulated and well-intentioned, is really up to this task.  Though the new processes and structures proposed here will, over many years, contribute to such changes, the success of this plan finally depends on it being backed by commitment and impelled by leadership that goes well beyond the plan itself.  This commitment and leadership must come from many individuals, but I urge the Board of Education in particular to continue to give this plan and its implications high priority.

The Board of Education has received training in such areas as how to manage change, how to resolve conflict, and how to analyze, realign and improve systems.  In another recent workshop on planning, the board received an outline presenting levels of progress.  Progress can be so little as to leave a situation essentially status quo.  It can be piecemeal, resulting in mere anecdotes about progress here and there.  But we can also have some progress, significant progress, and exemplary progress.  I believe the plan presented here will produce some progress, maybe even significant progress, but I want to urge the board to concentrate and apply all its training to the cause of achieving exemplary progress regarding diversity.  I would ask the Board to continue developing itself so it can model the commitment and leadership it will take to get us all there.  I would also ask its members to model continuing, deep personal change as well.

Shortly the Board will embark on more training,  part of which will detail the differences between management and leadership. We do not want to merely go through the motions, to “play” at diversity, to merely manage instead of lead.  Management may plan and budget, but leadership goes beyond that to establish direction.  Management may organize and staff, but leadership helps truly align people, forming vital coalitions and communicating direction by words and deeds.  Management may control, problem solve and monitor outcomes, but leadership motivates and inspires.  In the end, management may produce order, but leadership always aspires to produce not just order, but true change.

The assignment to help facilitate the writing of this plan came along at one of the most inopportune moments in my life.  I am faced with enormous demands as a teacher and writer; I am putting lots of effort into the church I attend; and I am facing some of the greatest personal struggles of my life.  Nevertheless, I knew an opportunity to participate in an epic American quest when I saw one.  Though I have lived most of my life here, I was not born here.  I am a first generation immigrant with fleeting, but haunting childhood memories of just getting off the boat.  So perhaps more than most people, I am obsessed with what it means to be an American.  And this is finally how we must see our efforts here.  As important as the processes and figures are, as important as it is to fit our efforts to this particular town at this particular time, we must understand that we are part of an American epic of democracy.  The writer James Baldwin, my intellectual patron saint, once wrote that our struggle over race is “not merely shameful, it is also something of an achievement.  For even when the worst has been said, it must also be added that the perpetual challenge posed by this problem was always, somehow, perpetually met.”  Well, maybe.  More often our quest to live together not just with tolerance, but true respect, has alternated between great hope and bitter disillusionment.  It is a tiring alternation.  But its frequency, and our cautious readiness to engage in it again and again over issues of our diversity is also deeply American.  So we continue, hoping that our inevitable shortcomings and failures will not discourage us from continuing to seek each other’s good will.

In composing this addendum, I am admittedly reaching for a language to frame the presentations of this plan I will make on your behalf to the city at large.  After our eyes scrutinize the plan with the care it deserves, this language needs to encourage us to lift our eyes to see the greater, American context in which it exists.  That greater context can be a source of the commitment we will all need to truly lead and change.  I have addressed these remarks mainly to the Board of Education, but in concluding I want to extend this call to leadership and change to all persons truly interested in the cause of greater diversity.

 

Posted in Diversity & Multiculturalism, Social Change | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Peggy McIntosh’s “Invisible Knapsack”

Dr. Peggy McIntosh

McIntosh speaking at Harvard

NOTE: You can find Dr. McIntosh’s essay “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack” at many places on the web, but according to the Wellesley Centers for Women’s website, on the page featuring Dr. McIntosh (see a brief bio below), these versions are all pirated and unofficial.  GO HERE for an updated official copy, and at the very end of this pdf, please note the proviso that you may not print more than 35 copies, nor post the pdf itself, without prior permission.

_____________________

 

 

In 1989 Dr. Peggy McIntosh, a white woman, wrote the influential essay “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack,” perhaps the most succinct analysis of white privilege yet written.  “I was taught,” she writes, “to see racism only in individual acts of meanness, not in invisible systems conferring dominance on my group.”   As associate director of the Wellesley Centers for Women, she began thinking of privilege as a male/female matter and was struck by “men’s unwillingness to grant that they are overprivileged, even though they may grant that women are disadvantaged.”

“These denials,” she continues in her famous essay, “protect male privilege from being fully acknowledged, lessened, or ended,” and blind us to the “advantages that men gain from women’s disadvantages.”

PrivilegeIt was only a short step to connect the issue to race.  “I think whites are carefully taught not to recognize white privilege,” she wrote, “as males are taught not to recognize male privilege…I have come to see white privilege as an invisible package of unearned assets that I can count on cashing in each day, but about which I was ‘meant’ to remain oblivious. White privilege is like an invisible, weightless knapsack of special provisions, maps, passports, codebooks, visas, clothes, tools , and blank checks.”

Perhaps most famously she lists over 50 “items” in the Invisible Knapsack.  Here are a few of my “favorites.”

6. When I am told about our national heritage or about “civilization,” I am shown that people of my color made it what it is.
8. If I want to, I can be pretty sure of finding a publisher for this piece on white privilege.
12. I can swear, or dress in second hand clothes, or not answer letters, without having people attribute these choices to the bad morals, the poverty or the  illiteracy of my race.
14. I can do well in a challenging situation without being called a credit to my race.
19. If a traffic cop pulls me over or if the IRS audits my tax return, I can be sure I haven’t been singled out because of my race.
23. I can choose public accommodation without fearing that people of my race cannot get in or will be mistreated in the places I have chose.
26. I can chose blemish cover or bandages in “flesh” color and have them more or less match my skin.

#6 and #26 seem to define the macro-micro ends of a spectrum, though on an everyday level, I’m not sure that #26 isn’t as big—the point being that people of color have to think about things like this that whites rarely do.*  In her book Racing Across the Lines (read my review Here and note her response), Deborah Plummer asks whites to go around for a full day thinking of themselves as white.  When I ask whites to do this, the response is almost always, “I don’t think of myself as white!” or “When I see people, I don’t see colors.”  Exactly.  That’s a privilege.  And that’s why  intentionally thinking about your whiteness is usually an eye-opening experience.

I have a personal story (sometimes many more than one) for #’s 12, 14, 19, and 23—especially #19, the dreaded “being pulled over”—but I’ll defer all to another day, except for one #12 story that involves me more indirectly.

Naperville United School District 203 Diversity PlanIn 1998 I led a committee to bring a Diversity Plan to one of Illinois’ largest, most prestigious school districts, Naperville’s District 203 (see HERE and scroll to item 3 for details and a link to the Plan’s brochure).   I was always accused of dividing people because so many believed that “America is a color blind society.”   I often asked if people thought America was a gender blind society, if it made absolutely no difference if you were male or female.  Most people could see that this mattered, but it was more difficult—sometimes impossible—to see that color did, even though the advantages of being white and the corresponding disadvantages of being of color are absolutely monumental in virtually every area of life.  American’s would rather talk about anything but race—anything.   But at one townhall meeting a white man suddenly and wistfully said, “You know, Saturday morning I was driving an old beater car through Naperville.  I was unshaven and shabbily dressed, and suddenly realized if I had been Black or Hispanic my odds of being pulled over would have skyrocketed.  I never before thought just driving around like that was a privilege.”

Which brings me back to #8 above.  It’s about publishing.  The only thing better would have been to have a conservative white man write something like Dr. McIntosh did, and some have (more on this later), though the depth and force of “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack” may always be the standard against which all will be judged.

 

*Note:  Johnson & Johnson did launch bandaids in “diverse skin tones” in 2005, though they discontinued the line in 2008 due to “lack of interest.”  Perhaps people of color thought they had more to worry about than bandaids!  But in 2020 J&J re-launched the brand, saying on Instagram, “We hear you,” and donating $100,000 to Black Lives Matter. 

  Go Here for Dr. McIntosh’s page on the Wellesley Centers for Women website, where you’ll also find links to other interesting spinoffs, including her talk at Harvard on how to use privilege constructively.

  Go to the TEACHING DIVERSITY main page, and to the Lead Post concering the anti-racism workshop Becoming the Beloved Community, where Dr. McIntosh’s essay plays a leading role.

______________________________
Dr. McIntosh, besides being associate director of the Wellesley Centers for Women, also founded the National SEED Project on Inclusive Curriculum (Seeking Educational Equity & Diversity), helping teachers create their own seminars on making school climates, K-12 curricula, and teaching methods more gender fair and multi-culturally equitable.   She directs the Gender, Race, and Inclusive Education Project (providing workshops on privilege systems, feelings of fraudulence, and diversifying workplaces, curricula, and teaching methods), co-founded the Rocky Mountain Women’s Institute, and has been consulting editor to Sage: A Scholarly Journal on Black Women.  She has taught English, American Studies, and Women’s Studies at the Brearley School, Harvard University, Trinity College (Washington, D.C.), Durham University (England), and Wellesley College.

Posted in Diversity & Multiculturalism | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments