Peggy McIntosh’s “Invisible Knapsack”

Dr. Peggy McIntosh

McIntosh speaking at Harvard

NOTE: You can find Dr. McIntosh’s essay “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack” at many places on the web, but according to the Wellesley Centers for Women’s website, on the page featuring Dr. McIntosh (see a brief bio below), these versions are all pirated and unofficial.  GO HERE for an updated official copy, and at the very end of this pdf, please note the proviso that you may not print more than 35 copies, nor post the pdf itself, without prior permission.

_____________________

 

 

In 1989 Dr. Peggy McIntosh, a white woman, wrote the influential essay “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack,” perhaps the most succinct analysis of white privilege yet written.  “I was taught,” she writes, “to see racism only in individual acts of meanness, not in invisible systems conferring dominance on my group.”   As associate director of the Wellesley Centers for Women, she began thinking of privilege as a male/female matter and was struck by “men’s unwillingness to grant that they are overprivileged, even though they may grant that women are disadvantaged.”

“These denials,” she continues in her famous essay, “protect male privilege from being fully acknowledged, lessened, or ended,” and blind us to the “advantages that men gain from women’s disadvantages.”

PrivilegeIt was only a short step to connect the issue to race.  “I think whites are carefully taught not to recognize white privilege,” she wrote, “as males are taught not to recognize male privilege…I have come to see white privilege as an invisible package of unearned assets that I can count on cashing in each day, but about which I was ‘meant’ to remain oblivious. White privilege is like an invisible, weightless knapsack of special provisions, maps, passports, codebooks, visas, clothes, tools , and blank checks.”

Perhaps most famously she lists over 50 “items” in the Invisible Knapsack.  Here are a few of my “favorites.”

6. When I am told about our national heritage or about “civilization,” I am shown that people of my color made it what it is.
8. If I want to, I can be pretty sure of finding a publisher for this piece on white privilege.
12. I can swear, or dress in second hand clothes, or not answer letters, without having people attribute these choices to the bad morals, the poverty or the  illiteracy of my race.
14. I can do well in a challenging situation without being called a credit to my race.
19. If a traffic cop pulls me over or if the IRS audits my tax return, I can be sure I haven’t been singled out because of my race.
23. I can choose public accommodation without fearing that people of my race cannot get in or will be mistreated in the places I have chose.
26. I can chose blemish cover or bandages in “flesh” color and have them more or less match my skin.

#6 and #26 seem to define the macro-micro ends of a spectrum, though on an everyday level, I’m not sure that #26 isn’t as big—the point being that people of color have to think about things like this that whites rarely do.*  In her book Racing Across the Lines (read my review Here and note her response), Deborah Plummer asks whites to go around for a full day thinking of themselves as white.  When I ask whites to do this, the response is almost always, “I don’t think of myself as white!” or “When I see people, I don’t see colors.”  Exactly.  That’s a privilege.  And that’s why  intentionally thinking about your whiteness is usually an eye-opening experience.

I have a personal story (sometimes many more than one) for #’s 12, 14, 19, and 23—especially #19, the dreaded “being pulled over”—but I’ll defer all to another day, except for one #12 story that involves me more indirectly.

Naperville United School District 203 Diversity PlanIn 1998 I led a committee to bring a Diversity Plan to one of Illinois’ largest, most prestigious school districts, Naperville’s District 203 (see HERE and scroll to item 3 for details and a link to the Plan’s brochure).   I was always accused of dividing people because so many believed that “America is a color blind society.”   I often asked if people thought America was a gender blind society, if it made absolutely no difference if you were male or female.  Most people could see that this mattered, but it was more difficult—sometimes impossible—to see that color did, even though the advantages of being white and the corresponding disadvantages of being of color are absolutely monumental in virtually every area of life.  American’s would rather talk about anything but race—anything.   But at one townhall meeting a white man suddenly and wistfully said, “You know, Saturday morning I was driving an old beater car through Naperville.  I was unshaven and shabbily dressed, and suddenly realized if I had been Black or Hispanic my odds of being pulled over would have skyrocketed.  I never before thought just driving around like that was a privilege.”

Which brings me back to #8 above.  It’s about publishing.  The only thing better would have been to have a conservative white man write something like Dr. McIntosh did, and some have (more on this later), though the depth and force of “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack” may always be the standard against which all will be judged.

 

*Note:  Johnson & Johnson did launch bandaids in “diverse skin tones” in 2005, though they discontinued the line in 2008 due to “lack of interest.”  Perhaps people of color thought they had more to worry about than bandaids!  But in 2020 J&J re-launched the brand, saying on Instagram, “We hear you,” and donating $100,000 to Black Lives Matter. 

  Go Here for Dr. McIntosh’s page on the Wellesley Centers for Women website, where you’ll also find links to other interesting spinoffs, including her talk at Harvard on how to use privilege constructively.

  Go to the TEACHING DIVERSITY main page, and to the Lead Post concering the anti-racism workshop Becoming the Beloved Community, where Dr. McIntosh’s essay plays a leading role.

______________________________
Dr. McIntosh, besides being associate director of the Wellesley Centers for Women, also founded the National SEED Project on Inclusive Curriculum (Seeking Educational Equity & Diversity), helping teachers create their own seminars on making school climates, K-12 curricula, and teaching methods more gender fair and multi-culturally equitable.   She directs the Gender, Race, and Inclusive Education Project (providing workshops on privilege systems, feelings of fraudulence, and diversifying workplaces, curricula, and teaching methods), co-founded the Rocky Mountain Women’s Institute, and has been consulting editor to Sage: A Scholarly Journal on Black Women.  She has taught English, American Studies, and Women’s Studies at the Brearley School, Harvard University, Trinity College (Washington, D.C.), Durham University (England), and Wellesley College.

Posted in Diversity & Multiculturalism | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

A Return to Plessy vs. Ferguson?

Homer Adolph Plessy

Apparently there is no known picture of Homer Adolph Plessy, the loser in the seminal Supreme Court case, though this picture is over and over said to be Plessy. An astute reader, Jordan, caught my mistake. This is actually P.B.S. Pinchback, a history maker in his own right, and, ironically, part of the group that orchestrated Plessy’s arrest as a planned action to challenge segregation.  Read more HERE.

Note: This article considers a monograph by Rick Guzman, my eldest son, the co-founder, with his wife Desiree, of Emmanuel House, which in 2016 was named one of the “Top 100 Most Innovative” social change organizations in the world.  Also in 2016 Guzman for Aurora promoted his run for mayor of Illinois’ second largest city.  A biographical sketch follows below, but first consider his important NIU Law School monograph on educational equity.  It led in part to his receiving the Thurgood Marshall award upon graduation.

____________________

It is a controversial title:  “An Argument for a Return to Plessy vs. Ferguson: Why Illinois Should Reconsider the Doctrine of ‘Separate but Equal’ Public Schools.”  A monograph by Rick Guzman, it appeared in the 2008 Northern Illinois University Law Review, and it reasons that since we have made little, if any, progress in making schools less segregated, we ought to de-emphasize desegregation for now and concentrate on making schools more truly equitable, at least in terms of resources.  Perhaps it all started as Rick thought about what may be one of our family’s “favorite” statistics.  He references it at the beginning of paragraph three:

“In Illinois today, because the majority of the state’s worse schools are predominately African-American, a black student is 4000% more likely to attend a chronically failing public school than a white student.  This is not a typographical error—not 50% more likely, which would be a tragic disparity, not twice as likely, or even 10, 20, or 30 times more likely, but 40 times more likely.”  This fact comes from Diane Rado, Darnell Little, and Grace Aduroja’s article “Still Separate, Unequal,” on page 1 of the May 9, 2004, Chicago Tribune.   (See a reproduction of this front page below.)  The situation hasn’t improved significantly in the years since.  Some have suggested it’s worse.

Plessy vs. Ferguson.  In 1892, Homer Adolph Plessy, an “Octoroon”—that is, someone 1/8th black—took a seat in a “whites only” car of a Louisiana train, thus violating a Louisiana law mandating racial segregation on its trains. He refused to move to the car reserved for blacks and—though he was 7/8ths Caucasian—was arrested.

4000In a 7 to 1 vote the Supreme Court ruled against Plessy, saying, in an opinion authored by Justice Henry Billings Brown, that separate facilities for blacks and whites satisfied the Fourteenth Amendment so long as they were equal. Though Justice Brown conceded that the 14th amendment intended to establish absolute equality for the races before the law, he noted that “in the nature of things it could not have been intended to abolish distinctions based upon color, or to enforce social, as distinguished from political equality, or a commingling of the two races unsatisfactory to either.” The phrase “separate but equal” was not part of the opinion, but by enshrining  this concept—the lynch pin concept of segregation—it effectively made discrimmination something Constitutionally lawful.

Brown vs. Board of Education.   It’s been 60 years since this landmark Supreme Court decision supposedly overturned Plessy vs. Ferguson, but white students have maintained an absolutely overwhelming advantage.   As noted above, in Illinois less than 1% of them go to failing schools.  40% vs. 1% is one measure of “white privilege.”  Getting a good college education is more necessary today than ever, yet when I bring this privilege issue up in my classes, I always—always—get white students talking about this or that case where a minority student got into college even though they were “less qualified.”  However, for every one of those cases—I don’t deny they exist—there are tens of thousands of black youth who never get a chance.

You could wait forever to wipe out discrimmination, but since that probably will never happen—because, as the old saw goes, “you can’t legislate morality,” and it’s as tough to legislate social norms—why not at least concentrate on lessening the effects of racism, what many call our country’s Original Sin?  Why not, says Rick Guzman, start thinking about ways to spread resources, leveling the playing  field a little, so perhaps someday black kids might only be, say, 2000% more likely to go to failing schools.  If 50% is, as he says, a “tragic disparity,” 2000% is hardly any cause to rejoice.  However, given our glacial progress in the 60 years since Brown, it would still be a huge leap forward.

Read Rick Guzman’s full 59-page monograph, for details on school inequality and ideas for making school resource allocation more equal.  [Note: It’s temporarily unavailable on the NIU Law School website, but you may view it on this site HERE.]

_____________________________

About Rick Guzman: Upon graduating from North Central College in 1999, Rick Guzman became a Mikva Fellow, then special advisor to the Governor of Illinois on issues of housing and anti-hatred.  He also helped run the committee which led to Illinois’ historic moratorium on the death penalty, and later helped create projects such as Sweet Beginnings, designed to help prisoners re-enter society and avoid re-arrest.  In memory of his brother Bryan Emmanuel (1985-2006), he and his wife Desiree founded Emmanuel House, an organization helping refugees and the working poor lift themselves out of poverty.  He directed Community Christian Church’s Lighthouse Project, an effort to develop the east Aurora, IL, community, and served as assistant chief of staff to Aurora Mayor Tom Weisner, overseeing community development.  He was given the Learners to Leaders award by his high school alma mater, and, upon graduation from Northern Illinois’ law school, the Thurgood Marshall Award, given to the student who “best epitomizes Justice Marshall’s deep understanding and commitment to equal justice under law, his dedication to the rule of law in a just society, and his use of the law as an instrument of social change.”  In 2016 Emmanuel House was named one of the “Top 100 Most Innovative” social change organizations in the world.  In the same year Guzman also announced his candidacy for mayor of Aurora.  Go Here to learn more.

_____________________________

A black & white reproduction of the artile “Still Separate, Unequal” as it appeared on page 1 of the May 9, 2004, Chicago Tribune.

Still Separate, Unequal article in May 2004 Chicago Tribune

Posted in Diversity & Multiculturalism, Social Change | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Diane Nilan wins Lifetime Achievement Award

Sun girl, a symbol of the National Association for the Education of Homeless Children and Youth

The NAEHCY “Sun Girl”

Another “congratulations” to Diane Nilan, founder of Hear Us, a national organization focused on giving voice and visibility to homeless children, youth, and their mothers.  At the 2012 NAEHCY Annual Conference (National Association for the Education of Homeless Children and Youth) Diane was awarded the prestigious Sandra Neese Lifetime Achievement Award for her decades-long advocacy for homeless people, and perhaps especially for her founding of Hear Us and her efforts at helping homeless kids get a fair shot at education.  You can read more about Hear Us on this site HERE, and by visiting Hear Us on the web at www.hearus.us.

At the 2012 conference, held in Albuquerque, New Mexico, Laura Vasquez, professor of Media Studies at Northern Illinois University, was also recognized with an Outstanding Leadership and Service award for her continuing work as editor and director of Diane’s films, in particular on the edge, which in May 2012 was shown on PBS stations nation-wide.  Read more about on the edge on this site HERE.

The major national organization devoted to education of homeless children and youth, NAEHCY began in 1989 as NASCEHCY, The National Association of State Coordinators for the Education of Homeless Children and Youth, aimed at state-level coordinators working to ensure that homeless children and youth received equitable and excellent services through public schools across the country. At its annual conference in Des Moines, Iowa, in the Fall of 1998, the Association removed the words “State Coordinators” from its name and expanded its membership to all individuals who attended the annual conference. Then in 2002 at its annual conference in Los Angeles, California, NAEHCY opened membership to everyone interested in homeless education.

Read more about NAEHCY at its website http://www.naehcy.org/about-naehcy/welcome.

I’ve excerpted a few pages from its 2012 Annual Conference program book to give you an idea of its breadth and to show the page on which Diane Nilan and Laura Vasquez are announced as winners of major awards.  See the excerpt HERE.

It’s a tremendous honor for Diane, but at a time when homelessness and poverty are on the increase she will not be tempted to rest on any laurels.  SUPPORT HEAR US by going to its website (www.hearus.us) to donate, to buy its films, books, and other products, to track Diane’s travels, articles, media, and initiatives, and to get involved in the continuing fight to end homelessness.

 

 GO TO the Hear Us MAIN PAGE on this site.
Listen to a radio documentary about Diane Nilan.

Posted in Social Change | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment