Frank London Brown Inducted into the Chicago Literary Hall of Fame

Earlier in this tumultuous year I missed an in-person meeting called by Don Evans, president of the Chicago Literary Hall of Fame, to pick this year’s inductees.  The final spot came down to two: Stanley Elkins and Frank London Brown.  I emailed my vote in and Don sent this note to the rest of the committee at the end of March:

Frank London Brown

“Hi All — I just heard back from Richard. He casted the deciding vote for Frank London Brown. He wrote, ‘I vote for Frank London Brown. His ties to Chicago are much stronger.  Trumbull Park is an important Chicago area story, and the short story “McDougal” a masterpiece touching on issues even more important today than when it was written.  The intensifying racial crisis of our time brings up many questions, including if whites can truly understand the impact of racism.  That’s a large part of what the story deals with…People might want to check [out my post on him] HERE…Stanley Elkins would be a good choice for another year.’”

Frank London Brown spent his tragically short life (1927-1962) both showing the horror of racism and holding out hope that whites could understand enough of that horror to help make the U.S. less racist someday.  In the HERE link above, I focus more on that hope because I included “McDougal” in my book Black Writing from Chicago. But I also spend some time with Trumbull Park, his important novel dealing with the horror.

The massive Encyclopedia of Chicago includes this entry on Trumbull Park:  “South Deering erupted in violence in 1953 over the issue of racial integration at the neighborhood’s lone public housing project, Trumbull Park Homes, located at 105th Street and Yates Avenue. Since 1937, the Chicago Housing Authority (CHA) had maintained an unstated policy to house only whites at projects that, like Trumbull Park, were located in entirely white neighborhoods. However, the project was ‘accidentally’ integrated on July 30, 1953, because the CHA assumed that Betty Howard, an exceptionally fair-skinned African American, was white. Beginning on August 5 and continuing nightly for weeks thereafter, crowds of whites directed fireworks, rocks, and racial epithets toward Betty and Donald Howard’s apartment. Police responded with a show of force but few arrests. South Deering leaders openly pressured Chicago politicians and the CHA to remove the Howards, while progressive forces argued for further integration. In October, after lengthy debate, the CHA’s commissioners reluctantly agreed to move in 10 additional black families, triggering a new round of white violence directed at blacks. A massive police presence prevented full-scale rioting, but chronic racial tension and sporadic violence continued through the 1950s. Not until 1963 could African Americans openly use a neighboring public park without police protection. The conflict claimed the career of the CHA’s progressive executive director, Elizabeth Wood, who had pushed the CHA’s commissioners to further integrate the project. White violence had succeeded in blocking any further racial integration beyond the token black population in the project.”

In fact, as Kathleen Rooney reports, “Black residents had to sign police logs to enter and exit their homes, and had to commute into and out of Trumbull Park in a paddy wagon, accompanied by armed officers. The police played up the indignity and humiliation by treating them like criminals.” How does one persevere under those conditions?  Can we truly feel enough of that pain from afar to keep us fiercely motivated to make our country less racist someday?

Frank London Brown's "Trumbull Park"Kathleen Rooney was part of that committee that met this past March to pick Chicago Literary Hall of Fame inductees, and recently published “How Trumbull Park Exposed the Brutal Legacy of Segregation,” for JSTOR Daily, an essential site for anyone interested in solid scholarly takes on a wide variety of issues illuminating today’s dilemmas.  Of the novel itself she writes: “Often, books from the past, even the ones with the best intentions regarding social justice, fall short of what contemporary readers might hope. Feminist texts may be shot through with subtle racism, and anti-racist texts might be marbled with misogyny. But Brown’s approach is refreshingly intersectional, emphasizing the centrality of the Black women of Trumbull Park. Buggy [Buggy Martin, the reluctant, every-man hero of the book] complains of the motley crew of fellow Black residents they have as allies, and how fractious even that group can be. Helen looks at him seriously and says, ‘It’s too bad we can’t pick the people to help us fight, Buggy. But it always seems that the most likely ones never come through, and the least likely ones always do. What’ll we do—refuse help because it’s not from the right people?’”

Trumbull Park sold 25,000 copies upon publication and was praised by many, some mentioning it in the company of Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun.  Yet Kathleen Rooney had trouble getting any copy except a hard-to-find University Press edition.  “Why aren’t more people reading this book?” she asks. “Even though it was effusively praised at the time of its 1959 publication by Gwendolyn Brooks and Langston Hughes, why does it not have the classic status it so richly deserves? Why, when it comes to the question of the great Chicago novel do we tend to hear the same set of names—Bellow, Algren, Sinclair—over and over with no mention of Brown?”  She unearths some important reasons, but none as crucial as from Frank London Brown himself.  Apparently, he felt he was writing more to a strictly black audience in a very specific way.  He did not focus on black victimization, nor was he interested in appealing to or threatening a white audience.  It all came down to the figure of Buggy Martin.  “If I could get the Negro reader to identify himself with this man,” Brown said, “then, at the end of the novel, the reader would be sworn to courage—if the trick I tried to pull on Negro readers worked—”

Sworn to courage.  Yes, Black Americans need this as they once again try to shoulder the burden of leading us into a better world.  It will be a decades-long haul, though, so it will be a necessary thing for all of us of good and hopeful will to swear ourselves to courage as well.

  Fair housing and especially home ownership are the greatest drivers of this nation’s growing and dangerous wealth gap.  See “The Racial Wealth Gap and Home Ownership,” and the work done to combat this by organizations like The Neighbor Project.  The best introduction to The Neighbor Project’s work and vision is HERE, a recent speech given by executive director Rick Guzman.

  Go to a list of Black Writers on this site, most of whom are in my book Black Writing from Chicago.  Most articles are much expanded versions of the introductions I wrote for the book.

Posted in Black Writers, Social Change | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Becoming JEDI

The VIDEO below shows my friend Dena Byrd and I introducing a new ministry team at our church—the JEDI Ministry.  It’s one small example of what a church can do to engage some of the major issues of the day, something the Christian church has often failed horrendously to do.*

No. Not this kind of Jedi.

JEDI began as a the Full Inclusion Taskforce, working to make our congregation a Reconciling Church, one which fully included LGBTQ persons.  But “reconciling” had, in our minds, a larger scope than sexual orientation, and even before the murder of George Floyd earlier in this tumultuous 2020 year members of the Taskforce had wanted to keep working on full inclusion, now focusing on issues of race.  As we worked to define our mission we began focusing on four things: justice, equity, diversity, and, sticking with our original charge, inclusion.  “Hey,” said Michelle Braxton, “that spells JEDI.”  I blame her for bringing it up, but the name has stuck.  We’re the JEDI Ministry, and as we invite members of our church to join us, we sometimes talk about “becoming JEDI.”

You can read our Vision Statement and Goals HERE.  Basically, we believe that for a church to become a Beloved Community, one where members grow closer to God, to each other, and to its community, it must also embrace—along with its traditional emphasis on our personal relationship with God—justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion.  We have often thought this embrace at odds with personal piety, thinking that a “social gospel” will take away from an emphasis on the individual and on the church as something “holy” and therefore separate from the corruption of “the world.”  We don’t want politics or social issues in the pulpit, we say, and many times that is right.  But much of the work of the church occurs outside of the pulpit as well.  JEDI seeks to break down this division and show that as the church seeks to fight the world’s corruption we grow as Christians because we’re doing this together and we’re engaging more fully one characteristic of Jesus that many pious people often got after him for:  he refused to separate himself from the world, even those parts most people thought were totally corrupt.  And even before Jesus’ physical appearance, the prophet Micah (in 6:8) famously said, “And what does the Lord require of you but to do justice, love mercy, and walk humbly with your God.”  Fighting against injustices in the world, in other words, increases our love of mercy and our humility before God.

So JEDI does three things, has three goals.  First, we study together as a ministry team, guided by our own interests, expertise, and the most important issues of history and today.  Second, we select from what we’ve read or watched those things we think might most benefit our congregation, then invite the whole church to read or watch and engage in special discussion sessions.  Finally, based on what we’ve studied as a ministry team and discussed together as a church, we try to move beyond study and discussion to action.

Our action plans are led by ministry team members according to their own interests and expertise.  Others in the team come along-side to help as they can, and we also put out calls to the congregation to help with this or that plan.  So far we’ve developed plans around four issues:  Voting, Poverty Reduction, and Advocacy, and we continue our interests in LGBTQ issues.  For example, two of our members who were interested in Voting and connected to The League of Women Voters held a voter registration event and sponsored an informative talk on voting by a LWV representative.  I chipped in by doing a video and article called “Voter Suppression 21st Century Style,” and produced a two-page summary of these for the voter registration drive.  I suspect our interest in this will continue, probably focused on resisting or rolling back efforts to gerrymander voting districts.  Because of my connection to The Neighbor Project, much of which began as our family foundation Emmanuel House, I will be exploring a long-term project joining The Neighbor Project and the South Suburban Immigration Project to help working families in or nearer Bolingbrook, IL, escape debt, build credit and savings, gain financial stability, and possibly even purchase a home.  Home ownership is the single greatest driver of the wealth gap in the United States, and especially the racial wealth gap.**  Others in the JEDI team are interested in advocacy for policies increasing Justice, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion in our society, and against policies that decrease these.

Perhaps the operative phrase in the paragraph above is “long-term.”  At a Laity Convocation in February 2020, I said that IF we worked really hard we could begin to see a less racist, less exclusionary, United States in 40 to 100 years.  A person on the panel at that Convocation said he thought I was being too optimistic.  I was.  But there are things happening all over the country to fight racism, as much or more now than at any other time in our history.  We can only hope everyone understands they must be in for the long, long haul.

*  I’ve spoken about this in my sermon “Who Do You Stand With?”, which preceded the church’s vote on whether to affirm LGBTQ persons’ “full inclusion” in church life and become a “Reconciling Congregation.”  The Full Inclusion Task Force soon after became the JEDI ministry, broadening its concerns to now focus on race and other full inclusion issues.

**  There’s no better place to gain a sense of The Neighbor Project’s work and vision than the talk executive director Rick Guzman gave at TNP’s 2020 Virtual Gala.  We need both vision and action and “Every Person’s God-Given Ability to Contribute” gives us a great example of how to articulate this.

Posted in Faith, Music & Media Podcasts, Social Change | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

How Racism Hurts Whites

Racism hurts whites deeply, down to the core of their identity, which is what Dr. Hendrik Pieterse addresses in the VIDEO below.  A white African who grew up in Namibia under the rule of South African apartheid, Henk gave the talk below during the opening session of the CPRES (Clergy Peer Reflection and Engagement Series) pilot program launch on September 15, 2020.  CPRES aims to help clergy in the Northern Illinois Conference of the United Methodist Church speak about racism in the pulpit and lead anti-racist activity in their congregations and communities.

But before getting into the depths, I wanted to start with something more common and every day, which I consider just as important as what’s “deep,” because the two are, in reality, inextricably linked.  One of the many ways racism hurts whites is just because it keeps them from being everyday friends with blacks and other people of color. Diversity works to enrich and regenerate every aspect of life.  In business, for example, we know that diverse teams just function better, working more effectively, insightfully, and creatively.  In terms of your friends, if they’re not diverse enough then each day you will get more squeezed down because your view of the world, your opinions, your aspirations come through such a limiting network of people who are pretty much like you. It may feel safer, but it’s an impoverishing situation.  You don’t grow, and your world stagnates and shrinks.

I was the other speaker at the CPRES pilot launch (see below), and as Henk and I talked about what we were going to say, I asked him what the blacks on his family’s farm in Namibia thought about this or that situation, this or that mode of thinking.  He replied that to his great shame he didn’t know because it never occurred to him to simply ask them.  That just wasn’t done, so the everyday conditions of their lives, their everyday thoughts, were unknown to him, and with that he lost a chance to expand his world by simply knowing another human being different than him.  His video below shows that this shame and shrunken perspective hurts and haunts him to this day.

As the CPRES Planning Team, of which Henk and I are a part, structured this pilot program, we worked on many things, including goal statements like this: “To learn about the history, stories, and trauma done to communities of color due to racism.”  I wrote the team: “Though these communities of color must remain central, I think it’s also important to acknowledge that perpetrators of racism, both conscious and unconscious, also suffer significantly in their own way.  For one thing—just one—they spend lots of psychic time denying their racism, shutting themselves off from the reality of their humanity, being therefore unable to deepen that humanity, and often becoming more monstrous as a result.”  This is not at all to equate the suffering of white people to the suffering of people of color at the hands of whites, but to say that whites also hurt themselves, and that hurt makes them take it out on people of color—and women—even more.  It makes them less human, a condition which is one of the greatest drivers of racism.

Writing in 1951, James Baldwin said, “Our dehumanization of the Negro then is indivisible from our dehumanization of ourselves: the loss of our own identity is the price we pay for our annulment of his. Time and our own force act as allies, creating an impossible, a fruitless tension between the traditional master and slave.  Impossible and fruitless because, literal and visible as this tension has become, it has nothing to do with reality.”  Nothing, that is, because as Martin Luther King, Jr. would write in his iconic “Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” “We are all caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny.”

Our difficulty in understanding these words begins in the everyday reality of a separation that blocks our everyday friendship.  American whites keep American blacks, as well as other people of color, at arms length, treating them as social phenomena.  Therefore, to paraphrase Baldwin slightly, “They are a social and not a personal or a human problem.”  They don’t know blacks as real people, even friends, which keeps all our anti-racist activities and good intentions safely impersonal, a condition that protects us from having to dig deep into our souls to discover how small racism has made them.

  Watch my talk at the CPRES pilot launch HERE.

HENDRIK PIETERSE is Associate Professor of Global Christianity and Intercultural Theology at Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary in Evanston, IL.

Posted in Faith, Music & Media Podcasts, Social Change | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment