Unpacking Racism: What Is “White Privilege” – Part 2

RaceConvo4

 

This article is part of a series of posts based on the 2020 Laity Convocation of the Northern Illinois Conference of the United Methodist Church.  Go to the Lead Post in this series for a complete list of articles.  Below is PART 2 of Rebecca Fraley‘s talk on the meaning of White Privilege.
Read Part 1 of her comments.

 

 

Part 2 of Rebecca Fraley’s talk explores several aspects of White Privilege, the first two below based largely on Peggy McIntosh’s famous essay, “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack.”

____________________

“As Peggy McIntosh asked herself, inspiring her famous essay: ‘On a daily basis, what do I have that I didn’t earn?’ We need to ask ourselves ‘Who built that system?’ and ‘Who keeps it going?’

White Privilege as the “Power of Normal”
“Some subtle versions of white privilege can be used as a comfortable starting for people to begin the discussion—some simple everyday conveniences/things that white people are not forced to think about:  ‘flesh-colored’ band-aids in your first-aid kit, the ‘hair-care’ aisle versus the smaller separate section of ‘ethnic hair products,’ ‘ethnic foods’ section in large grocery stores.

White Privilege as the “Power of the Benefit of the Doubt”
“The media (print, TV shows, movies, news) show more positive portrayals of white people.  White people are less likely to be followed, interrogated, or searched by law enforcement for ‘looking suspicious.’  If accused of a crime, white people are less likely to be presumed guilty and/or sentenced to death.  Just as people of color did nothing to deserve this unequal treatment, white people did not ‘earn’ disproportionate access to compassion and fairness.  They receive it as the byproduct of systemic racism and bias.

White Privilege as the “Power of Accumulated Power”
“The power of ‘normal’ and ‘benefit of the doubt’ would not exist if systemic racism hadn’t come first.  And systemic racism cannot endure unless those powers still hold sway.  Imagine it as a sort of ‘whiteness water cycle,’ where racism is the rain.  That rain populates the earth, giving some areas more access to life and resources than others.  The evaporation is white privilege, an invisible phenomenon that is both a result of the rain and the reason it keeps going.

“For example, the ability to accumulate wealth has been a long-standing white privilege created by overt systemic racism in both public and private sectors.  Wealth passed from one generation to the next in the form of inherited property, college educations, increased earning power.  The cycle continues…

WhtPriv1b“Post WWII, the GI Bill provided white veterans with a ‘magic carpet ride to the middle class.’  Racist zoning laws segregated towns and cities, redlining by the Federal Housing Administration built discrimination right into building codes, resulting in people of color being denied opportunities to raise their children and invest their money in neighborhoods with high home values.  The cycle continues…

“So although it is not necessarily a privilege to be white, it certainly has its benefits.  White people can generally count on police protection rather than harassment.  Depending on their financial situation, white people can choose where they want to live and choose safer neighborhoods with better schools.  White people are given more attention, respect, and status in conversations.  Nothing white people do is qualified, limited, discredited, or acclaimed simply because of our racial background.  White people don’t have to represent their race and their actions are not judged as a credit to their race or as confirmation of its shortcomings or inferiority.

“‘It’s not that white Americans have not worked hard and built much.  We have.  But we did not start out from scratch.  Much of the rhetoric against more active policies for racial justice stem from the misconception that all people are given equal opportunities and start from a level playing field…’ (Source: Showing up for Racial Justice)”

Main Sources:  “What is White Privilege, Really? Recognizing white privilege begins with truly understanding the term itself,” Cory Collins, Teaching Tolerance (Issue 60, Fall 2018); “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack,” Peggy McIntosh (1988).

_________________________

Not acknowledging White Privilege is one of the root reasons racism remains so intractable, long lasting, and deep.  Yet acknowledging this is one of the hardest things to do.  To add a little to Rebecca Fraley’s thoughts, we Americans, for one thing, believe that everyone’s on a level playing field, and that everything we’ve achieved we’ve done basically on our own, with little help.  We’re a pull-yourself-up-by-your-bootstraps kind of country (although that move is physically impossible!), and anyone who doesn’t just isn’t trying.  Going further, whites often evade their privilege by charging reverse discrimination.  Because I’ve spent most of my career in colleges, I’ve written that I don’t deny that every now and then a person of color gets in because of their race, but for every one person whom race helps there are at the very least 10,000 persons who, because of racism, never even get a serious chance to apply.  Please also note the following:

  For more on Fraley’s comments on accumulating wealth, watch Season 1: Episode 1 of the Netflix series Explained.  It’s on the “Racial Wealth Gap,” and spends significant time on the importance of HOME OWNERSHIP, the main focus of The Neighbor Project, an organization begun when my oldest son Rick and wife Desiree started Emmanuel House as a living memorial to his youngest brother Bryan Emmanuel Guzman.

  For more on educational inequality go to “A Return to Plessy vs. Ferguson?,” an article based largely on Rick Guzman’s law school monograph on education.  Upon graduation he received the Thurgood Marshall Prize for his contributions to education.

  Go to the Teaching Diversity main page.

Posted in Social Change | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Who Do You Stand With? A Sermon for Transfiguration Sunday – Part 1

I preached this sermon on February 23, 2020, ahead of a vote at my church to become a Reconciling Church and join the Reconciling Ministries Network, a network of churches advocating for full inclusion of LGBTQ+ persons.  This issue has been a contentious one in the United Methodist Church for decades, coming to a boil when the 2019 General Conference of the church voted to uphold the “Traditional Plan,” maintaining and tightening restrictions on LGBTQ+ persons and clergy who supported them in such things as marriage.  Due to technical issues, a video of this sermon may not be available.  It will be posted if it does become available.  What follows is a rough recollection of what I said.  After reading this Read PART 2.

My "paddle" award from the Minority Students Association. See text for what's inscribed on it.

My “paddle” award from the Minority Students Association. See text for what’s inscribed on it.

I guess, given the vote we’re taking after this service, this is a kind of hot-seat sermon.  I’ve spoken a lot at hot-seat times, and want you to know—I don’t like it!  I even brought this paddle to defend myself just in case.  It’s one of my most prized possessions.  The plaque on it is inscribed: “DR. RICHARD GUZMAN.  The Minority Students Association presents this to you with whole-hearted gratitude and sincere appreciation for your support.  P.S. You can use it to defend yourself against all the people whose feathers you ruffle for us and others.”

But when I see this paddle it mostly reminds me of what more I could have done, and how little it took to encourage these students.  I spoke up a few times.  I stood with them a few times.  And it didn’t cost me all that much. I really don’t deserve it, though many have said to me, “You don’t know how much it meant to us when you stood with us.”

This is Transfiguration Sunday, when we celebrate the time when Jesus took his disciples up to the holy mountain and was transfigured before them.  It’s represents the end of the Season of Epiphany which began with a burst of light in the sky: the star that led the Magi to the Christ Child.  Now that season ends with another light: the light transfiguring Jesus and leading us into the Season of Lent and His death.  There’s a lot to say about this, but since I have to try to be brief, we’ll focus on just one theme: who Jesus was standing with.  He appeared bathed in a bright light and standing with Moses, who led the Children of Israel into physical freedom and gave them The Law. So likewise Jesus led us out of spiritual captivity and summed up all the Law and prophets, saying, “You shall love the Lord God with all your heart, mind, and strength…and your neighbor as yourself.”  And he stood with Elijah, who defeated false prophets and warned us of the idols which bind us—something that Jesus would also do with even greater depth.  I want to ask this morning: Who do you see yourself standing with?

Three quick scenes.  One. I’m 17, a good guy doing good deeds—I was president of our high school club Princeps, for example, which was our honorary service society—and thought myself pretty smart.  I hated religious fanatics, and especially those who handed out pamphlets.  But one day I’m in San Francisco’s Golden Gate Park, and when I get back Stand1to my car I find…a religious pamphlet on my windshield.  I rip it off, stick it in my back pocket, all incensed, and when I get it home rashly flip it open, finding on page one Romans 3:23—“All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.”  What a stupid thing, I thought; I bet it’s not even in the Bible.  So I grabbed the Bible I’d gotten when I was baptized as a child, a Bible I don’t think I’d opened much, if at all, since then, turned to Romans and…there it was: “All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.”  I broke out in a cold sweat.  I kept telling myself for two solid weeks that this reaction was stupid, too.  I brought all the reasoning skills I could against it, but this feeling—a feeling I recognize now as the Holy Spirit working me over—wouldn’t go away until I finally admitted, Yes, I too was a sinner, no matter how smart, how nice, how many good things I did.  I realized, in other words, that I stood with all sinners.

Scene Two.  During my long career I’ve met lots of famous people, so I have lots of names to drop.  But the one that’s affected me most is meeting Maya Angelou, the great American poet, actress, and activist.  I brought her to my college long ago, and one of the people who came to the show was…Oprah Winfrey, who calls Miss Angelou “Mother.”  It was quiet an evening, and I’ve written about it in more detail in a piece on my website you can read HERE.  It was widely re-posted after Miss Angelou’s death in May 2014.  In her performance that evening at the college her theme was “You have already been paid for.”  That is, what are you going to demand of yourself, how high will you set the bar for yourself, because you have already been paid for.  Who do you see yourself standing with?  In the 12th chapter of Hebrews, Paul tells us we should run and finish the race before us because we’re surrounded by a great cloud of witnesses. Maybe this cloud includes Moses and Elijah, but I feel it also includes all those ancestors, all those loved ones, who have gone before you and are watching, cheering you on.  They have paid a price for you to be here today, to be still in the race.  I especially think of those who fought to be free so you could be free.  This is Black History Month, a time to think of all those Civil Rights pioneers who bled and died.  They did this for all of us, you know.  Do you stand with them?  Do you see yourself standing surrounded by them, speaking with them, like Jesus was speaking to Moses and Elijah?

Scene Three.  We were supposed to go to a Valentine’s Day concert with Efren and Kim Ramos until Kim’s knee surgery got scheduled for…Valentine’s Day.  So Linda and I went and experienced something we’ve experienced at virtually every live concert we’ve ever been at.  The leader of the band shouts, “Everybody feeling alright?”  And the crowd shouts back so luke warm that he r she has to shout out again, “I can’t hear you. Everybody feeling alright?!”  And has to do it again and again and again until he or she gets something—anything—back that resembles enthusiasm.

[Continue to PART 2 of sermon]

Go HERE for a complete list of sermons, like “Pentecost Means No ‘Supremacies,'” “Sacred Doing,” and “Theology and Race.”

Posted in Diversity & Multiculturalism, Social Change | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Who Do You Stand With? A Sermon for Transfiguration Sunday – Part 2

This is PART 2 of a sermon I preached on February 23, 2020, ahead of a vote at my church to become a Reconciling Church and join the Reconciling Ministries Network, a network of churches advocating for full inclusion of LGBTQ+ persons.  This issue has been a contentious one in the United Methodist Church for decades, coming to a boil when the 2019 General Conference of the church voted to uphold the “Traditional Plan,” maintaining and tightening restrictions on LGBTQ+ persons and clergy who supported them in such things as marriage.  Due to technical issues, a video of this sermon may not be available.  It will be posted below if it does become available.  What follows is a rough recollection of what I said.  Read PART 1.

Stand-BonhfrI love the church, so it really pains me to say that, on the whole, the church has not been good standing with or speaking up for people who are fighting for freedom, equality, and inclusion, people asking—crying out—for help and protection.  You against racism?  And the church kind of whispers, “Oh yeah, we’re against that.”  I’m glad that this year’s Laity Convocation had as its theme “Unpacking Racism” (see link below), and I’m really glad I could participate.  I know the UMC has a commission on race, too, and I’m happy about that. But it’s 2020, nearly seven decades after Brown vs. Board of Education and we’re still talking about unpacking racism. The church could speak up louder with more vitality and conviction, instead of—on the whole—mumbling, “Yeah, we’re against racism.”  We kind of stand with people, but it’s a weak, droop-shouldered stance.  Our voice has been tepid, luke warm, and worse: often the church, instead of standing with these people, has acted to keep them un-free, un-included, and in danger.  Of course, of course, there are exceptions.  Martin Luther King, Jr. came out of the church, as did many, many who fought and continue to fight for Civil Rights.  But on the whole the church’s response has not only been tepid; it remains to this day one of the bulwarks of racism, and Sunday remains perhaps the most segregated day in America.

It’s been similar, sad to say, in our stance against sexism. Again, the church has provided some place for women to develop their gifts and to lead, but on the whole, when it speaks, that voice, too, has mumbled around for decades, and very often those in the church who would keep women subservient have spoken up much louder and with greater conviction.

The ultimate example of the church’s luke warm, whispering voice, its slack-shouldered stance, was in Nazi Germany.  Again, there was opposition to Nazi rule, and the so-called Confessing Church spoke loudly against the regime.  One of its leaders was Dietrich Boenhoeffer, who wrote the great book The Cost of Discipleship, which begins with that startling sentence, “The great enemy of the church today is cheap grace.”  We want all the advantages of grace but don’t want to do anything for it.  We don’t want to stand with people, speak up for them.  Bonhoeffer was executed.  Another leader of the Confessing Church was Martin Niemoeller, who uttered the famous words: “When they came for the Communists, I didn’t say anything because I’m not a Communist.  When they came for the Jews, I didn’t say anything because I’m a Christian. When they came for the Trade Unionists, I didn’t say anything because I don’t belong to a Trade Union.  And then they came for me, and it was too late.  There was no one to speak up for me.”  Niemoeller spent seven years in a concentration camp.  But on the whole, the traditional German church whispered its objections.  Its virtual silence enabled the horrors of the war and the concentration camps, and much of the church openly stood with that evil regime.

Stand-NmlrWe could speak louder.  That’s what the vote to join the Reconciling Ministries Network really amounts to today.  It’s amplifying our voice for, and standing stronger with LGBTQ persons. We won’t even be the first UMC church in our district to do so.  We also know that the vast majority of American UMC congregations—something like 85%—do not support the Tradition Plan passed by the last General Conference.  But my own sense is that that opposition has been spoken with the church’s usually whispered voice, “Oh sure, we’re against not fully including LGBTQ people.”  We could speak up louder, stand with LGBTQ people stronger.  Does this church have to do it now?  No.  We could do what’s usual and wait until it’s safer.  But that would lead, again, to us joining in on a general, luke warm whisper—as usual.

I want you to know that in many ways I get it.  It’s normal not to want to take strong stands. But there’s more.  I know we also come to consider a church a family, and, of course, there’s two things we’re warned never to talk about with family: politics and religion.  It’s strange, isn’t it, that we don’t even really want to talk about religion in a church!  We’re afraid of splitting the church, but that’s because we haven’t yet learned to live with diversity.  This church in particular prides itself, rightly so, on its diversity.  But diversity means more than just diversity of race, ethnicity, age, and the like. It’s diversity of opinion, too.  Most of us want to be in a church where we believe everybody thinks alike.  That’s more comforting, certainly, but that’s not really a vital church.  It’s a cult.  The great historian Doris Kearns Goodwin wrote a book on Lincoln titled Team of Rivals.  It was his genius, she says, to put diverse, conflicting views in his cabinet.  We need both people in this church: those who oppose becoming a Reconciling Church, and those who favor it.  I favor it, but I’ll be here no matter what the outcome is.

I urge a yes vote because I believe unless more churches speak up louder now, take stronger stands now, it’s possible we could be talking about full inclusion years from now.  But unlike racism or sexism, I think our society as a whole—and especially its young people—have already largely moved on in terms of LGBTQ+ inclusion.  They’re for it and don’t see what we’re fussing over.  So when society—and especially its young—see us still arguing inclusion years from now, the church’s weak stand will make it seem to more and more people that we have not just a weak voice, but an irrelevant one, too.

Go HERE for a complete list of sermons, like “Pentecost Means No ‘Supremacies,'” “Sacred Doing,” and “Theology and Race.” 

♦  Go Here for the Lead Post in a series of articles on the Unpacking Racism Laity Convocation.

 

Posted in Faith, Social Change | Tagged , , | Leave a comment