Our “Green Book” fantasy, plus other Oscar winners that don’t hold up

GreenBook-Trib2This was front page, Arts & Entertainment section, of the February 3, 2019, Chicago Tribune.  Though the Christopher Borelli article focused on other things, my direct answer to the question about Green Book—which won 2018′s Oscar for Best Picture—is this: You’re not necessarily bad, but you are typically American.

In many ways, I am, too.  In fact, I enjoyed Green Book as a piece of simple entertainment. I’ve written many, many times that Americans would rather talk about anything—anything—but race in serious, informed ways.  Sometimes I even entertain the fantasy, like the typical American, that race and racism will just magically go away if we ignore it, don’t talk about it, and just be nice to one another.  But it’s not going away in the foreseeable future.  It’s woven into, not just stamped on to, the fabric of our national culture; and Green Book was just another in a long, long list of entertainments that helps us avoid this uncomfortable fact, feeding the fantasy we hold so dear.  The caption to the picture above (probably too small to read clearly here) says, in part:  “The film, to put it mildly, offers a very tidy view of race relations.”

Now that the Oscars approach again, I was reminded of this 2019 Green Book piece by the recent William Bibbiani piece in The Wrap (January 7, 2020), “Green Book and 13 Other Oscar Winners That Don’t Hold Up.”  Here’s his list:

1929′s Broadway Melody.  1931′s Cimmaron.  1933′s Cavalcade.  1936′s The Great Ziegfield, first biopic to win—which, in a phrase that could apply to all films that don’t hold up, Bibbiani calls, “sanitized, padded, and implausibly fawning.”  1947′s Gentleman’s Agreement.  1952′s The Greatest Show on Earth.  1956′s Around the World in 80 Days.  1989′s Driving Miss Daisy.  1999′s American Beauty, called “contrived and self-congratulatory.”  2001′s  A Beautiful Mind, which “hammers its way through one biopic cliché after another.” 2002′s  Chicago.  2005′s  Crash.  2010′s The King’s Speech, which beats Jennifer Lawrence’s first and best work, the bleak Winter’s Bone.  And 2018′s Green Book.

GreenBook-FoodIt would be fairly easy to show how each one of these films is racially coded in significant ways, depending on the suppression of race, or tacit enforcement of racial stereotyping, for their created worlds to work.  Directly or indirectly, each feeds the fantasy I mentioned earlier.  For now, though, it’s enough to note that three of these films directly address race and racism in comforting ways, becoming in essence comfort food for the American soul. 

Driving Miss Daisy feeds us “being nice” as comfort.   As Bibbiani writes, the bigoted main character, the Miss Daisy played by Jessica Tandy, “gradually learns to be less bigoted because her chauffer, played by Morgan Freeman, is nice.”  In 1989 Spike Lee’s Do the Right Thing also comes out, but in a move that only emphasizes America’s desire not to talk about race seriously, it’s not even nominated!

Crash feeds us miraculous change as comfort.  Bibbiani calls the film “unbelievably phony and smug,” saying that, “every single story line relies so completely on forced irony,” the major one being that Officer Ryan (played by Matt Dillon) who feels up and disgraces Christine (Thandy Newton) in the beginning is the one who pulls her from a burning car at the end.  We’re led to believe there’s been changes of hearts: instead of feeling her up he saves her…and she lets him.  Racism solved.  And, as a bonus, his sexual assault of this very same woman at the beginning of the film can also be blotted out. This film beats out Capote and Brokeback Mountain, whose significance has well outlasted Crash.

Which brings us back to Green Book, which for comfort feeds us a version of “white saviorism,” a theme played over and over in film after film after film.  We’ll solve racism by actually saving, redeeming, uplifting these poor colored folk, raising them to white standards so they can finally begin to move towards equality, maybe even towards being loved.  Long before the film reached theaters, Dr. Don Shirley’s family protested the portrayal of Shirley (played by Mahershala Ali) and the overplaying of his chauffer (Viggo Mortensen) in Shirley’s life.  Talk about a white savior: the chauffer literally feeds Shirley what appears to be his first taste of fried chicken, at least KFC style fried chicken.  The Don Shirley Trio played so-called Third Wave jazz, a fusion of jazz and classical music that had its day, and some of which I liked.  But funny that near the film’s end, Don Shirley does just fine playing straight out boogie-woogie blues.  Maybe he knows something about his own culture after all.  At least the chauffer’s wife (Linda Cardellini) knows that her husband needed lots of help writing her those love letters.  In this, and a few other things, Don Shirley civilizes his chauffer a little.  But he doesn’t save him.  That wouldn’t have comforted us much at all.

(I say two stars.)

  Go to a list of Reviews on this site.


Posted in Arts, Reviews & Commentary | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Writing About the Philippines

This post serves partly as an index to all of the writing I’ve done on this site about my homeland, The Philippines.  My relation to this homeland has been problematic my whole life, and, in fact, the list of writings below is one of my strongest bonds to my birth country.  That is, I read about the Philippines and write about its history and culture more than I’m actually in that culture itself.  Or in the actual country itself.

1stPassport2I was born in Manila in January 1949, leaving it to join my father—a U.S. Army soldier—in Okinawa in November that same year.  “Oh, when were you home last?” so many of my friends, especially my Filipino friends, ask.  I’ve never been back.  My father could not come back for my birth even, so his first sight of me was when I was already eleven months old.  After we all boarded a boat and came to the United States in 1951, I know of only one time he himself went back. He did so after my mother died in 1981, and, it seems, almost died there himself, though we didn’t find out until many weeks later because there was still no phone in our village, San Esteban, Ilocos Sur, so we had to wait until someone walked the many miles south to La Union to call us.  My mother and father’s marriage caused a giant blowup between the two families—formerly friends, her brother, Uncle Jimmy, being my Dad’s best friend.  Until he married his sister.  My Mom didn’t speak to some of her siblings for 20 years or more afterwards, and both Mom and Dad told us, every time visiting the homeland came up, that the Philippines was a place you never ever wanted to be.  When my Dad’s Mom died, my parents fought about whether he would go back for his own mother’s funeral.  He didn’t.

Then there is the language.  In “Homelessness and Me” I’ve written about the deep, isolating pain of losing my native language. I don’t know that I’ll ever go back until—if ever—my language skills get better.

PhilippinesI received my most intense Filipino experiences the summers I spent as a “tween” and early teenager in Terra Bella and Porterville, California, mostly working the fields: picking tomatoes, grapes, and figs, hoeing weeds, pulling leaves.  There I heard the language again, though found it virtually impossible to speak.  There I helped hand-slaughter animals, mostly pigs and goats, for feasts.  Now, since I’ve been attending Friendship United Methodist Church (Bolingbrook, IL) for many years, I’ve been back with more Filipino friends than I have in decades.  They love me and I them, but not being able to speak my own language, or the Tagalog most of them speak, is a deep, deep pain.

Which leaves me a student of books and media and a writer of articles about the Philippines.  Listed first below is my major article on N.V.M. Gonzalez, one of the Philippines’ greatest writers.  It helped establish me as a writer and scholar.

  Go to the Teaching Diversity page on this site.


Posted in Diversity & Multiculturalism, Writing | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Memories from the Mountains

This piece was written many years ago for the Chicago Reader (which eventually didn’t publish it) as a review of the Field Museum exhibit “The People and Art of the Philippines” mounted in the early 1980’s.  It is slightly modified from the original manuscript.

 “Carlos, my boy! How does it feel to be home?”  MacArthur to Romulo, October 20, 1944.

“Carlos, my boy! How does it feel to be home?” MacArthur to Romulo, October 20, 1944.

It is one of the most memorable scenes of the Twentieth Century.  On October 20, 1944—two years, seven months, and nine days after telling the Philippine people he would return—U.S. General Douglas McArthur was indeed back, striding now in the surf of a Leyte beach, sunglasses in place, jaw set in a scowl which seemed to indicate the steely character of one who habitually fulfilled great prophecies, even if they were his own.  On the way to the beach the General’s barge had paused at the transport John Land to pick up two famous Filipinos.  Carlos P. Romulo, sometime press aid to the General and always one of his greatest allies, came down the ramp first.  The second was Sergio Osmena, the man who had assumed the Philippine Presidency at Manuel Queson’s death on August 1st.  Some have read hesitancy and reluctance into Osmena’s greeting of MacArthur at that moment, and for good reason.  Dull and weak in comparison to the beloved Queson, Osmena felt all the more small in the presence of the demigod MacArthur.  Anyway, he could never be as close to the General as Romulo, and could only recede further as MacArthur embraced his glamorous compatriot and said, “Carlos, my boy! How does it feel to be home?”

That’s the way it seems to be for the Filipino: powerless, on the one hand, to compete with a foreign intrusion, and, on the other hand, almost too willing to accept a foreign embrace.  It has been this way for centuries.  The landing site the General surveyed from his barge on that October 1944 afternoon was very nearly the same landfall he had contemplated as a young officer on his first trip to the Islands in 1903, and very nearly the same that greeted a famed explorer some four centuries earlier.

Burial Jar.  Ceramic, Palawan, Manunggul Cave.

Burial Jar. Ceramic, Palawan, Manunggul Cave.

Magellan made his fateful landfall on March 16, 1521, and since then, with the signal exception of his slaying six weeks later by Lapu Lapu—now seen as a great Philippine hero—it has seemed possible to read the bulk of Philippine history as a series of capitulations.  Politics, religion, even names—these all became largely Spanish; and the Americans transformed the culture even more.  The first political party organized under American jurisdiction (the Partido Federalista) has as one of its major planks eventual annexation to the U.S.  And in general Filipinos so embraced American ideals—albeit after a fierce, bloody, valiant resistance: the Philippine-American War—that Americans found it natural to refer to them as “little, brown brothers.”

“I am often at a loss to account for the genuine native,” wrote the Philippine journalist P.C. Morante in 1940.  “I have the physical qualities of my race; but I feel that the composition of my soul is thoroughly soaked with the alien spirit…My actions and reactions, my thoughts and ideals, even my complexes and inhibitions—all this seems to revolve around a foreign pattern that is easily recognizable as intrinsically of the West.”

Here’s a famous Philippine joke.  A Filipino takes an unsuspecting American to a restaurant and asks if he’d like to try the Philippine national drink. “Of course!” the American replies enthusiastically.  The Filipino orders him…a Coke.


That was my generic introduction to almost anything I’ve written about Philippine culture.  MacArthur, Magellan, Spanish surnames, Coke.  A multitude of similar scenes, similar artifacts.  They all imply the same thing, all seeming to pop up whenever I think and write about my Homeland.  They crowded my mind each time I visited the recent Field Museum exhibit “The People and Art of the Philippines.”

The introductory information mounted neatly on a wall plaque at the exhibit’s entrance speculates that some of the artifacts on display may be news even to many Filipinos.  That’s probably true—not necessarily because Filipinos are unaware of them, but because they are only now beginning to see them in a certain light.  The exhibit’s artifacts may be divided roughly into two categories.  The first, the category of “the familiar,” are those heavily influenced by the West, especially Spain.  Here are moving paintings of the Crucifixtion, a gorgeous church altar, several competent—even brilliant—statues of saints and pieces of religious jewelry.  Though in some curves and ornamental flourishes of the altar, for example, one senses a peculiarly Malay element of joyously inexact symmetry, the pieces in this first category move clearly in a Western orbit.  They’re the products of the heritage of so many Filipinos, that 85% of the population—the Tagalogs, Ilocanos, Visayans, Pampangans, and others—who occupied the low-lying coastal areas and thus felt most directly the extraordinary domination of Spain and the U.S.

Memories-QuoteIt’s the other 15% that’s kind of newsy.  Here are the southern Moro peoples (Maranao, Maguindanao, Tansug…), the tribes in Northern Luzon (Ifugao, Bontoc, Ilongot…), these latter largely situated in the Gran Cordillera Central, the 200-mile-long mountain range dominating Luzon and giving birth to virtually every river system on the island.  These people resisted—and resist to this day—Western domination.  Though most of Luzon’s mountain dwellers were originally coastal folk, they soon moved to the mountains, some directly because of Western pressure, some through more mysterious calls and urges.  Some, though claiming the mountains as home, carried on small wars with the coastal peoples and foreign rulers clear into the 20th Century.  The Ifugao, for example, were a particularly nagging concern to the Spanish, but campaign after campaign, military as well as religious, failed to subdue them—these headhunters, these savages.  The art from this 15% of the Philippine population: that will most likely cause stirrings in the deep recesses of the Philippine soul.  At least that’s what happened to me, and I doubt I’m atypical.


In the past the majority of Filipinos, if they considered these other tribes deeply at all, might have considered them as marginal, strange, sometimes pestering appendages to the main population, or perhaps as merely exotic spices in an overall mix dominated by their tastes, the tastes of the powerful, culturally sophisticated lowlanders.  Now, on a growing wave of apprehension that lowland tastes smack entirely too much of Coke, more and more Filipinos look at swords and wedding flags from the Sulu Archipelago, tube skirts from the Magindanao, textiles from the Ilongot, and wooden figures from the Gran Cordillera mountain people as profound indexes of hat they themselves were in the deep past, even before Magellan.

The exhibit’s arrangement encourages such connections.  The first object, said to be the most famous find in Philippine archaeology, is a burial jar found in Palawan and dating somewhere around 2000 B.C.  After a few more ancient pieces come the more numerous, more familiar pieces of the Spanish period.  Then come the pieces by the 15%, and one feels suddenly tugged back to the era of the burial jar, as if the long, rich, flowery Spanish period were an interruption to a style of artistic expression more truly one’s own.

Hipag. Wood, 16 cm, Ifugao.

Hipag. Wood, 16 cm, Ifugao.

I was particularly taken by a small Ifugao wood carving.  The statue, 16 cm. high, is of a sitting man, a hipag, a minor deity.  Reflexively, I saw it as one of the finest examples of Western, cubist, “primitivist” art I had ever seen.  It bothered me that I couldn’t shake these Western labels.  For this piece also spoke to me of a cultural identity so much my own that I felt the burden of those alien spirits lifting, the crushed substances of a distant native past springing to form.  There the hipag sits, right forearm rising so that left hand rest on left cheek.  The figure is representational, though figurative rather than realistic.  The head, too large for its body, sports an oval, almost heart-shaped, flatish face on which two small slanted slits high on the forehead are the eyes, and below a broad, nominally protruding nose, a small slit is the mouth.  It is a fitting answer to Rodin’s The Thinker.  The arms and back elongated, though: no rippling muscles allowed, and back straight, not bent over in an agony of thought.  The mouth, with an ever so slightly upward curve, could suggest a smile, or at least some winsomeness, as if the mysteries the hipag contemplates lead him more to acceptance rather than gloomy brooding.  Winsome as the whole figure is, however, its place in the cultural scheme is complex and sometimes dark.  Great power resides in the hipag when involved in rituals of violence and aggression.  It is, in fact, a war god ritually smeared with the blood of sacrificed animals when its presence is needed in battle, sorcery, or witch-doctoring.  Thinking of the carving now from a distance of several months, though, I see more and more possibilities of meaning.  That a winsome smile and the blood of violence co-exist so calmly, for example, could point to a less dualistic view of life, a view squarely opposed to the profound dualism of the West.

But most of all the hipag gave form to something we all search for passionately: something, anything, to call our own.

Around the hipag were larger Ifugao statues: the bulul, powerful guardians of the rice granaries.  Towards the exhibit’s end came the swords from the Sulu Archipelago, models of which—bastardized as they are—can often be found in Filipino homes, perhaps as a sign that amid the overwhelming evidence of profound Westernization there exists in the Philippine soul an uncrushable longing for a less dependent identity.  For me the hipag revived some ancient memory, one now residing in far mountain reaches but, strangely enough, strong enough to balance another, more familiar memory, that memory accidentally created when a barge ran aground too soon.  The General would have to wade ashore now.  That, I like to think, was why he was really scowling.

  Go HERE for a list of all writings on the Philippines.

Posted in Arts, Diversity & Multiculturalism | Tagged , | Leave a comment